Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Recent IELTS Exams (Canada & India) · 2026-09-28

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people believe that old buildings, such as town halls and art galleries, should be restored, even though this can be costly. Others argue that governments should replace them with new, modern buildings.

Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.0)

mostly people think that government should outdated building like town halls and art galleries, make them functional, Therefore the mantinance of these buildings cost too much. and many people think government should convert them into new and latest buildings. i strongly believe government should invest in these type of traditional and art buildings

on the one hand authorites should make sure these type of old era buildings such as resort, different art gelleries, and other historical building must be functional beceause these type of places are very useful and important for the country. for Instance, most of the old buildings are discribing country own cultures and traditions. it is very essential to invest these type of places. government need to spend money on their maintenance beceause it is very help ful for economy(GDP) beceause many tourist come who want to learn about a nation history and some people are very intrusted in nation art and love to visit and it keep alive local market in the area where there buildings take place

on the other hand many people think our policy makers should not invest on these things and make different type of buildings which are useful for long time and modren era such as hospital, school,musuem and univeristies beceause these are much more helpful for upcoming generation and a long term investment they also things these old art galleries are cover very large area for example, if government replace these with hospital them people take oppointments or doctor easily and earlier. and if authorities make school or Universities it will be a great help to produce more talent which wil be very helpful for National Interest

in concluion, some people think old buildings, like art galleries and town hall should be restructured whatever the cost. but other argue that government should replace with latest buildings. I believe, authorities should inest on these building maintenance such as art galleries and townhall

AI examiner evaluation

CriterionBand
Task Achievement / Task Response5.5
Coherence and Cohesion5.0
Lexical Resource5.0
Grammatical Range and Accuracy4.0
Overall5.0

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

The response addresses all parts of the prompt by discussing both views on whether to restore old buildings or replace them with modern ones, and the student explicitly gives their own opinion ("i strongly believe government should invest in these type of traditional and art buildings"). The ideas are relevant and supported with explanations, such as economic benefits from tourism and the utility of new infrastructure like hospitals and schools. However, some arguments remain somewhat repetitive and under-developed, falling short of the depth required for Band 7. For instance, the discussion on economic impact is basic ("it is very help ful for economy"). Therefore, the response aligns best with Band 6.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.0

The essay is divided into four paragraphs, reflecting a clear overall arrangement with an introduction, two body paragraphs addressing opposing views, and a conclusion. However, cohesion is frequently faulty and mechanical. The student relies on repetitive transitions like "on the one hand," "on the other hand," and "in concluion," and uses punctuation incorrectly (e.g., lowercase starting letters, missing periods followed by commas). Referencing is sometimes unclear, and cohesive devices are inadequate for higher bands. Progression is evident, but the structural flaws place this response firmly in Band 5.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

The vocabulary used is adequate for the task, allowing the student to communicate their ideas about historical buildings versus modern infrastructure ("functional," "maintenance," "traditional," "tourist"). There are noticeable spelling and word-choice errors throughout the text, such as "mantinance," "authorites," "gelleries," "discribing," "beceause," "intrusted," and "inest." The student attempts less common vocabulary with varying degrees of accuracy. These errors do not completely impede communication, making this performance representative of Band 5.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 4.0

The student attempts a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, but control is weak. There is a frequent lack of punctuation, capitalization errors, and run-on sentences (e.g., "government need to spend money on their maintenance beceause it is very help ful for economy(GDP) beceause many tourist come who..."). Grammatical errors are very frequent throughout the response, including subject-verb agreement issues and missing articles, which occasionally cause difficulty for the reader. This performance aligns with Band 4.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.