Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Recent IELTS Exams (Canada & India) · 2026-10-01

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people believe that old buildings, such as town halls and art galleries, should be restored, even though this can be costly. Others argue that governments should replace them with new, modern buildings.

Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.0)

There is considerable debate over whether money should spend on restoration of old building, like townhouse and art calories while other argue that the government should build new advanced building instead this as a shall shut light to the both the aspects in the subsequent paragraphs.

On the one hand, proponents of this view argued that historical building represent the cultural value and the glory of its country. The primary reason is that it cannot be ignored that these art calorie preserve the history of centuries, and tell the story of many numerous, even that shaped our country and society for instant read for Taj Mahal Juto museums are and many more. They are the valuable assets that will help new generation to understand their roots better.

On the other hand opponents are you that authority should be new model building than restoring the old one one significant factor is that old building has concern related to safety because how old they are while new building will benefits a lot consider for example ,with new building there will more tourism which will eventually help the local vendor to increase their sale and help in to build the economy stronger also

In conclusion, both prospective have merits, however I believe that saving the old history is more vital particularly because for our future generation, they need to know about their ancestor and what they have done for them to give them better and secure future

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.0

The response addresses the prompt by discussing both views and providing a personal opinion, but it only partially fulfills the task requirements because some ideas remain limited and under-developed. For instance, the discussion of safety concerns regarding old buildings is introduced without sufficient extension or supporting examples. Furthermore, it is important to note that the response contains 244 words, which fails to meet the minimum length requirement of 250 words. To achieve a higher band, the writer needs to expand fully on all parts of the task with well-supported arguments and ensure the word count requirement is satisfied.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The text presents a coherent overall arrangement with a recognisable introduction, body paragraphs addressing each view, and a conclusion. Paragraphing is used to separate ideas, and some basic cohesive devices such as 'On the one hand' and 'In conclusion' are employed to guide the reader. However, cohesion is occasionally mechanical and referencing is not always clear, as seen in dense run-on sentences lacking appropriate punctuation. Progression is sometimes hindered by abrupt transitions between points. To progress further, the writer should use a wider variety of cohesive ties more flexibly and ensure logical links between sentences are smoother.

Lexical Resource: Band 4.5

The vocabulary used is minimally adequate for the task, but the range is limited. The writer attempts some less common vocabulary, such as 'restoration' and 'proponents', but encounters noticeable errors in word choice and word formation, such as writing 'art calorie' instead of 'art gallery', 'townhouse' instead of 'town hall', and 'prospective' instead of 'perspectives'. Additionally, there are spelling and collocation inaccuracies throughout the text that cause some difficulty for the reader. To improve in this area, the student must focus on precise word choice, accurate word forms, and correct spelling of common academic terms.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

The writer demonstrates a limited range of structures, relying on a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, though attempts at complex sentences are frequently faulty. There are frequent errors in grammar, such as missing articles ('should spend on restoration of old building'), incorrect verb forms ('proponents of this view argued'), and faulty subject-verb agreement. Punctuation is also weak, with multiple sentences running together without proper terminal punctuation. While the general meaning can usually be deciphered, these frequent errors cause difficulty for the reader. Greater control over basic grammatical structures and sentence boundaries is needed to reach a higher level.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.