Band 4.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 4.5 · Recent IELTS Exams (Canada & India) · 2026-10-13

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people believe that old buildings, such as town halls and art galleries, should be restored, even though this can be costly. Others argue that governments should replace them with new, modern buildings.

Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 4.5)

In the salad days of the millennium, the society has polarised into two groups almost equally regarding the notion that whether some peploe think that old buildings,town hall and art galleries should be rebuilt or other trust that government should make new design .Different people have distinct mind set.The following paragraph would shed the light on both approches before making final notes.

To commence with the first notion, there are myriad things to be shared in its favour.First and foremost old buildings things restored to other place,as a result after the place not like historical place. Secondly it more costly to move consequently if any things broken during the moving then it is very hrad to rejoining.

Shifting toward the second school of thoughts , government should replace hence its places dirty and plastics bottels around here.Moreover,government has full fund replace those therfore if it make new then more vistiors come here and slelfline more longer after rebuilt.

Having discussed the arguments and counter arguments I would like ti infer that goverment should redesign to all old buildings. To justify state of my mind there is an instance of maintaing places and cover with the glass no one can touch there.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 4.0

The response attempts to discuss both positions and gives a final preference for redesigning old buildings, so the main parts of the prompt are recognisable. However, the arguments are only minimally addressed: the first view is difficult to follow in “old buildings things restored to other place,” while the case for replacement relies mainly on litter and the claim that more visitors will come. The opinion is also unclear because “redesign” is not explained, and the example about covering places with glass does not clearly support it. The response is 201 words, below the required 250, which further limits the development of the discussion. Explain each view with a clear reason and a relevant example, then state precisely what governments should do and why.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

There is a basic overall structure: an introduction, separate paragraphs for the two views, and a conclusion. Signposts such as “To commence with,” “Shifting toward,” and “Having discussed” help identify the stages of the response. However, progression within paragraphs is weak because ideas are not clearly connected or explained; for example, the link between moving a building, damage, and restoration is hard to follow. Some transitions sound formulaic, and the conclusion introduces the glass-covering example without preparing the reader for it. Use a clear topic sentence in each body paragraph, develop one main point at a time, and use linking words to show the actual relationship between ideas rather than simply announcing a new section.

Lexical Resource: Band 4.5

The response attempts some less common expressions, including “myriad,” “school of thoughts,” and “polarised,” and uses topic-related words such as “historical” and “visitors.” However, vocabulary is often inaccurate, misspelled, or poorly collocated, which makes several points difficult to understand. Examples include “peploe,” “approches,” “slelfl ine,” and “old buildings things restored to other place.” Phrases such as “make new design” and “more visitors come here” are too imprecise for the intended argument. Aim for accurate, natural combinations rather than ornate expressions: for instance, describe buildings as “preserved,” “renovated,” or “replaced,” and explain whether they have historical or practical value. Proofread spelling and word forms carefully.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 4.5

The response uses a few attempts at longer structures, including “even though” in the opening and “if any things broken during the moving then…” in the first body paragraph. However, the range is limited, and frequent errors in sentence construction, verb forms, agreement, articles, and punctuation often obscure meaning. For example, “the society has polarised” lacks a clear grammatical connection to the topic, and “government should replace hence its places dirty” does not form a complete, clear clause. There are also run-on sentences and inconsistent spacing around punctuation. Practise building accurate simple sentences first, then combine them with one controlled subordinate clause. Check that each sentence has a clear subject and verb, and use articles and plural forms consistently.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.