Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Recent IELTS Exams (Canada & India) · 2026-10-25

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people believe that old buildings, such as town halls and art galleries, should be restored, even though this can be costly. Others argue that governments should replace them with new, modern buildings.

Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

Traditional building such as temple, art galleries play a vital role to connect new generation with their roots. Therefore, some individuals claim that government should spend some money to preserve these bulidings ; however , it can be expensive. Whereas, others said that aouthorists ought be built modern amenties, such as hospitals , schools , by replaced old bulidings. This eassy will explain both viewpoints along with my viewpoint.

There are various supporting points why people want to restore art galleries and town hall. The predominant one is that these bulidings represent a town history and culture which crucial to attach new generation with their culture and traditional.For instance, Golden Temple in Punjab represent the scarifice of pioneers lives to save sikh indentity around the world. Moreover, museum and art galleries not only show a nation rich in their culture and ritual but also a great source of income of a nation as people ,from all over the world come to visit these histotical buildings. Owing to this , tourism company boost their ecomony and give helphing hand to a nation in development.

On the other hand , there are various resons why folks emphasis replacement of old historical bulidings with latest buildings. The chief reason is that governments should provide the basic amenties to citizens such as hospitals , school, shopping centres , which would only be possible if they will eliminate old unnecessary towns due to lack of space . Futhermore, they think that govermnment just waste money to perserve old art galleries as moderns

generation has less keen to visit these place. Therefore, authorists should utilize to consultt new clubs , sport centre to increase economy of nation despite waste money on old buildings.

In conclusion , Although, modern buildings are essential to fulfill demands of basic needs of a country , old town and art galleries should be saved as it give a identity to a nation and attach new generation with root of their culture and tradition.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

You address both sides of the discussion and give a clear preference for preserving historic buildings in the conclusion. The reasons are relevant: you connect heritage sites with cultural identity and tourism, while the opposing view focuses on providing hospitals, schools and other facilities where space is limited. The Golden Temple example helps make the preservation argument more concrete. However, some points are asserted rather than fully explained. For instance, the claim that modern generations are less interested in galleries is not supported, and the proposed replacement of old buildings with clubs and sports centres is not clearly linked to the earlier argument about essential services. Develop these points and explain how governments might balance preservation with practical needs.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a clear overall structure: an introduction, one paragraph for each viewpoint, and a conclusion. Paragraphs generally have a central focus, and signposts such as “On the other hand” and “In conclusion” help readers follow the discussion. However, some connections are mechanical or unclear. The opening uses “Whereas” in a way that leaves the contrast sentence incomplete, and “Therefore” does not clearly follow from the preceding point about modern facilities. References such as “these place” and “these buildings” can also be vague. Improve progression by linking each example directly to the claim it supports, and use fewer formulaic transitions in favour of clearer logical connections.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You attempt topic-specific vocabulary, including “preserve,” “culture,” “historical buildings,” “tourism,” and “basic amenities,” which gives you resources to discuss both heritage and development. However, spelling errors and inaccurate word choices are noticeable and sometimes make the reader pause: “bulidings,” “aouthorists,” “amenties,” “scarifice,” and “ecomony” are examples. Some combinations are also unnatural, such as “attach new generation with their culture” and “give helping hand to a nation in development.” Aim for accurate, natural collocations and check spelling carefully. Reusing a smaller set of correctly controlled terms would be more effective than attempting several imprecise expressions.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You use both simple and complex sentence forms, including a concession in the conclusion and clauses introduced by “which” and “as.” This allows you to express contrasts and reasons. However, some sentence structures are faulty, and errors in agreement, articles, verb forms and punctuation recur. For example, “these buildings represent a town history and culture which crucial” needs a verb and clearer article use; “Golden Temple … represent” has a subject–verb agreement error; and “if they will eliminate” uses an unsuitable verb form after “if.” The opening contrast with “Whereas” is also incomplete. Review sentence boundaries and practise accurate complex clauses, especially conditionals and relative clauses, while checking agreement and articles.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.