Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Recent IELTS Exams (Canada & India) · 2026-10-28

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people believe that old buildings, such as town halls and art galleries, should be restored, even though this can be costly. Others argue that governments should replace them with new, modern buildings.

Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

It is often believed that former buildings like halls as well as art galleries should be restored however, this can prove costly.There is group which argues that goverments should build new buildings instead of restoring the old ones.From my persepective authorities should replaced old buildings with new buildings.In this essay these views will be discussed in detail. The main reason of supporters of this view that old buildings should be restored is that they belive that these buildings are assence of a nation.These galleries provide the information of culture and histroy to the upcoming generation because in this modern world youngsters do not read books they prefer to visit historical buildings and art galleries.For example, people who are keen on to learn about their hertiage but they do not have resources of getting information,they would definetly come to these buildings and would be able to learn about culture. The other sector who believe that governments should replace old buildings to new one is mainly that these buildings cannot be beneficial for public anymore instead of keeping them there should be more buildings. In the construction of new buildings more chances of employment would be provided to public.Thre is a substantial number of people who do not have jobs for their daily bread and butter,while construction of buildings and establishment of different businesses would be effective for youngsters. To sum up, it can be said that although old buildings are main sources of information to people, these can be proved beneficial for unemployed people to get more chances of jobs.I would argue that governments should replace old buildings with new bvuildings because they can be effective for people.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

You discuss both positions and state your own view: you explain that historic buildings preserve cultural knowledge, while new construction may create employment, and you conclude in favour of replacement. These points are relevant, but the response only partially develops the task. The case for restoration is supported with a general example about people learning their heritage, while the case for replacement focuses mainly on jobs and does not explain why old buildings should be replaced rather than renovated or how new buildings would serve the public better. Your position is stated, but the opening phrase “should replaced” and the conclusion’s brief reasoning make it less clear and convincing than it could be. Develop each side with a specific, explained example and make your comparison more direct.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

The response has a recognisable structure: an introduction, one paragraph for each view, and a conclusion. This helps the reader follow the broad discussion. However, progression within paragraphs is sometimes unclear, and links between ideas can feel mechanical or imprecise. For example, “The other sector who believe” introduces the opposing view awkwardly, while “instead of keeping them there should be more buildings” does not clearly connect the problem with the proposed solution. The example in the first body paragraph also runs into the preceding explanation without clear punctuation. Use topic sentences that state each paragraph’s main point, then explain and illustrate it in a clear sequence. More precise referencing and transitions would make the argument easier to follow.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use some relevant topic vocabulary, including “historical buildings,” “culture,” “heritage,” “construction,” and “employment,” so the reader can understand the main ideas. There are also attempts at more formal phrasing, such as “sources of information.” However, the range is limited and several inaccurate word choices, collocations, and spelling errors make the writing less clear and natural. Examples include “assence of a nation,” “keen on to learn,” “daily bread and butter,” and “establishment of different businesses.” Repeated use of “buildings” and “people” also limits precision. Choose vocabulary that expresses the intended relationship accurately, and proofread spelling; for instance, “essence,” “history,” and “heritage” need correct forms.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and more complex sentences, including a reason clause with “because” and a contrast introduced by “although.” However, the range is limited, and complex constructions are often faulty. Examples include “There is group which argues,” “authorities should replaced,” and “The main reason of supporters of this view that…,” where articles, verb forms, or sentence structure are missing or incorrect. Punctuation also causes problems: the opening sentence joins contrasting clauses without a suitable full stop or conjunction, and several sentences run together. These errors sometimes make the reader pause to interpret your meaning. Practise building accurate subject–verb sentences first, then add subordinate clauses and check each sentence for complete structure and punctuation.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.