Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · IELTS Predictions Nov 2026 · 2026-11-09

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people believe that playing team sports, such as football, is more beneficial than playing individual sports, such as tennis or swimming. Others believe individual sports are more beneficial.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

In contemporary society, physical fitness plays an essential role in an individual's life. While some members of the public believe that playing team sports, such as football is more advantageous than playing individual games such as tennis or swimming, others strongly agrue that individual sports are more favourable. In my opinion, I am more inclined to support team sports are more useful because in team you get best emotional support, effective communication as well as it fosters growth.

The foremost reason why I agree this opinion is that it strengthen bonds with others which contribute to effective communication and team work which paves the way to success in sports. For instance, team members assist each other about weak areas within the sports. However, when everyone resolves each other issue it leads to unity that is a vital key point in a game.

Futhermore, these games are benefical for physical and mental well-being. It helps to maintain strong immune system which fights with infections as well as hazardeous aliments.

On the contrary, some people believe that individual sports are useful. The foremost reason for this is that whole game success depend on single person performance. For instance, if someone do not want to play in team they can play alone in that you do not need to hear other team member.

To conclude, from my perspective both the sports have its own pros and cons. However, I believe team sports are better because it helps in maintaining effective communication, gives emotional support and financial support sometimes.

AI examiner evaluation

CriterionBand
Task Achievement / Task Response5.0
Coherence and Cohesion6.0
Lexical Resource5.5
Grammatical Range and Accuracy5.0
Overall5.5

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.0

You present a clear preference for team sports and include a reason for each side, so the response is relevant to the question. However, the discussion is only partial and the supporting ideas are under-developed: team sports are linked to communication and unity, while the individual-sports paragraph mainly says a person can play alone and need not listen to teammates. The claim that sports improve health is not clearly connected to the comparison, and the conclusion introduces “financial support” without explaining it. The response also falls five words short of the 250-word minimum; the ten words copied from the task prompt are excluded. Develop the individual-sports case with a specific benefit and example, and explain each main point more fully.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a recognisable overall arrangement: an introduction, reasons supporting team sports, a contrasting paragraph, and a conclusion. Linking expressions such as “Furthermore,” “On the contrary,” and “To conclude” help signal these stages. However, progression within paragraphs is sometimes unclear. For example, the health paragraph is not explicitly tied to either side of the comparison, and “when everyone resolves each other issue” does not clearly show how the point follows from the previous sentence. Some references, including “these games” and “it,” are also vague. To strengthen organisation, give each paragraph one clear purpose, connect examples directly to its main idea, and use pronouns only when their reference is unmistakable.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use some topic-relevant vocabulary, including “physical fitness,” “emotional support,” “effective communication,” and “well-being,” and you attempt more formal expressions such as “foremost reason.” However, the range is limited and several word choices or collocations are inaccurate or awkward, which sometimes makes the meaning less clear. Examples include “agrue,” “benefical,” and “hazardeous,” as well as “hear other team member” and “financial support” in the conclusion. Some phrases, such as “vital key point,” are also repetitive in meaning. Build accuracy by checking spelling and learning common word partnerships, and choose precise terms that express the intended benefit rather than relying on broad or repeated wording.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and complex sentences, including a contrast clause beginning “While” and a reason clause introduced by “because.” However, the range is limited, and errors in sentence construction and agreement occur often enough to make some ideas difficult to follow. For example, “I am more inclined to support team sports are more useful” combines two sentence patterns; “it strengthen bonds” has subject–verb disagreement; and “whole game success depend on single person performance” lacks accurate agreement and article use. The sentence beginning “For instance, if someone do not want…” also has agreement problems. Practise building complete clauses with consistent subjects and verbs, and check articles, plurals, and punctuation before submitting.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.