Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 5.5 · IELTS Predictions Nov 2026 · 2026-11-09
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
Governments often have to make choices about jobs, business and pollution. Some people say that economic stability and a clean environment in a country can be maintained at the same time. Others disagree.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 5.5)
As Abrahmn Lincoln said a successful government always is " of the people, for the people, by the people" . So to serve the people, the govenment must make the right choices to create new job, improve business and reduce pollution. On achiving them a country can have an economic stability as well as maintain a clean enviroment.
First and foremost many countries in asia and europe have achived econmic stability and clean enviroment by different means, but these countries have their own share of geological challanges, people demographic and population density. however we can learn by reviewing their government policies on how they conquered their challanges and overcomed them. For example Taiwan has one of the most robust economy at the moment. They are one of the pioneers in creating polices to maximise waste management and waste recycling. Taiwan has implented laws with respect to waste mangement like on how to dispose different types of waste, how to segregate different waste and carry your own bags while shopping. By these laws the government helps the companies to recycle the waste in a profitable way as the waste segregation process is eleminated .
The Taiwan govenment also introduced policies and incentives to recycle the waste so that the reliance of imported plastic and metal goods has reduced which in turn boosted the business and job availabilty for the Taiwanese people.
In conclusion, a govenment can provide an economic stabilty and a clean enviroment by reviewing and learning policies implemented by other countries who have successfully implemented them and have them tailored for our people demographic and challanges.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 4.5 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 5.5 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.5 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.5 |
| Overall | 5.5 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 4.5
Your position is clear: you believe economic stability and a clean environment can coexist, and the Taiwan example gives relevant support through recycling rules and incentives. However, the task asks you to discuss both views, and the response mainly argues that the two goals can be achieved together. It does not explain why some people think economic growth and environmental protection conflict—for example, because pollution controls may raise costs or restrict certain industries. The opening and conclusion repeat your position, while the supporting discussion focuses on one country and one policy area. To address the task more fully, explain the opposing view, then weigh it against your own position with developed reasons and examples.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5
The response has a recognisable structure: an introduction, a paragraph presenting the Taiwan example, a further paragraph on its economic effects, and a conclusion. This makes the main position reasonably easy to follow. Linking phrases such as “First and foremost,” “For example,” and “In conclusion” help signal stages in the argument. However, the progression is limited because the essay does not organise a discussion of both views, and the two Taiwan paragraphs overlap in their focus on recycling policies and benefits. Some references, such as “By these laws,” are understandable but could connect more precisely to the specific measures just listed. Give each paragraph a distinct purpose and use clearer links between the environmental and economic effects.
Lexical Resource: Band 5.5
You use some relevant topic vocabulary, including “waste management,” “waste recycling,” “incentives,” “reliance,” and “population density.” These terms help communicate the example and show an attempt to discuss policy and economic effects. However, spelling errors are frequent, including “govenment,” “enviroment,” “achived,” and “availabilty,” and several word combinations are imprecise, such as “people demographic” and “economic stability and a clean environment” being described as something a government can “provide.” Repetition of “waste” and “policies” also limits variety. Check spelling carefully and build more natural collocations, such as “demographic characteristics” and “maintain economic stability while protecting the environment.”
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5
You attempt a mix of sentence forms, including a complex sentence beginning “By these laws” and a relative clause in “countries … who have successfully implemented them.” The main ideas are generally understandable, but errors in sentence construction and grammatical control remain. For example, “On achiving them a country can have” has an unclear opening phrase, while “the reliance … has reduced” uses an awkward tense construction; “the reliance … has been reduced” would be more controlled. The opening quotation also has inconsistent spacing and punctuation. Aim for clearer clause structures, check subject–verb and article use, and punctuate quotations and sentence boundaries consistently. These revisions would make the argument easier to read.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.