Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Recent IELTS Exams (Canada & India) · 2026-11-11

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The pie charts below show how working adults in a particular country spent their time in 1958 and 2008.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

* Note: these aren’t the original diagrams given in the test, they were recreated for the purpose of demonstration.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

The given two pie chart illustrates the information regarding that how time is spent by the working adults in their particular country on various activities in 1958 and 2008.

Overall, it is crystal clear that in both the years working had the highest percentage of workers, whereas travelling to work had the least proportion of time.

After analyzing, it is perceived that in both the year the percentage of playing sports remain same allocated about 7%. Moreover, working has the highest number of time spent by people around 33% and 42% in year 1958 and 2008, respectively. In year 1958, relaxing to home had the percentage around 8 which rose up to 13% in 2008.

With regards to the rest of the descriptions, it is crystal clear that in year 1958, sleeping allocate the percentage of 32 which decline to 25% in 2008. In 1958, travelling to work had the least percentage of around 2 which rose 3 more percentage allocating it around 7% in 2008. 14% of decline is shown inyear 2008 while going out with friend and family. In both the given year playing sports had the same percentage around 7.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

You identify the main contrast that working takes the largest share in both years, and you report several figures accurately, including work, sleeping, relaxing at home and commuting. The overview is relevant, but its claim that commuting was the smallest category in both years is not accurate: in 2008, going out with friends and family was 6%, below commuting and sports at 7%. There is also a significant omission: the 1958 chart has no sports category, so saying sports remained at 7% in both years is unsupported. Your account of the 14-point fall in socialising is present but not clearly quantified with the original values of 19% and 6%. Select the key comparisons carefully and make the overview fully accurate.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

The response has a recognisable structure: an introduction, an overview and two detail paragraphs. This gives the reader a basic route through the information, and phrases such as “Moreover” and “With regards to” signal additions. However, progression is weakened by repetition: the sports figure is stated twice, and “it is crystal clear” is repeated without adding information. The final paragraph combines sleeping, commuting and socialising without a clear comparison pattern, while “14% of decline” is difficult to connect to the preceding figures. Group the increases together and the decreases together, and use precise references to make each comparison easy to follow.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use relevant chart vocabulary, including “percentage,” “allocated” and “decline,” and the reader can generally understand the activities being compared. However, several word combinations are unnatural or imprecise, such as “relaxing to home,” “highest number of time” and “rose 3 more percentage.” “Crystal clear” is also too emphatic and informal for an academic report, especially when repeated. Some wording obscures the intended comparison, as in “14% of decline is shown inyear 2008.” Aim for standard collocations for describing proportions and changes, and use a more neutral reporting style. Check spacing and spelling as well, including “inyear” and “friend and family.”

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and more complex sentence forms, and the main message is usually recoverable. However, errors in sentence construction and verb forms occur often enough to make some comparisons awkward. For example, “that how time is spent” has an unnecessary structure, “in both the year” lacks plural agreement, and “playing sports remain same” needs a correctly formed verb and article. In “sleeping allocate the percentage,” the subject and verb do not agree, while “which decline to 25%” needs a past-tense form to match the dates. Review articles, plurals, agreement and tense consistency, and simplify sentences when needed so the data relationships remain clear.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.