Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Recent IELTS Exams (Canada & India) · 2026-07-26
IELTS Writing Task 1 question
The pie charts below show how working adults in a particular country spent their time in 1958 and 2008.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
* Note: these aren’t the original diagrams given in the test, they were recreated for the purpose of demonstration.
Student answer (Band 6.0)
The sets of pie chart compares proportion of how employed adults utilizes their day on multiple activities namely going out with friends and family, travelling to work, sleeping, relaxing at home, playing sports and working in a particular country in 1958 and 2008.
It has been clearly observed that, in 1958 working individual had spending long hours in working that is 33%. From the whole day this group of people occupied 32% in sleeping. Going out with friends and family was 19% from total time they have free in day. Activity like Relaxing at home and commutation had negligible percentage of day spent which was 8% and 2%. In sports activity they spent around 7% hours.
In contrast in 2008, Hours spent in working activity increased by 9% as it was 42%. However, engaged people in sleeping and going out with friends and family had reduced their hours spent to 25% and 6% from 32% and 19%. Relaxing at home and commutation activity seems to had risen hours spent on each of activity that it had 13% and 7% incline in hours spent. Spor
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 6.0 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 6.5 |
| Lexical Resource | 6.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 6.0 |
| Overall | 6.0 |
Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.0
The response provides a clear overview and identifies key trends, such as the increase in working hours and the decrease in time spent sleeping. However, the response is incomplete, as it cuts off mid-sentence at the end. While the main features are selected and reported, the lack of a concluding summary or a fully developed final paragraph limits the depth of the analysis. To reach a higher band, ensure all data points are fully articulated and the response is brought to a logical conclusion rather than ending abruptly.
Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.5
The essay is organised into paragraphs, which helps the reader follow the structure. There is an attempt to use cohesive devices such as 'In contrast' and 'However' to signal shifts in the data. However, the flow is interrupted by the incomplete final sentence. Additionally, some transitions between sentences feel slightly mechanical. To improve, focus on using a wider variety of linking words and ensure that each paragraph has a clear, finished thought to maintain logical progression throughout the text.
Lexical Resource — Band 6.0
The vocabulary is generally adequate for the task, allowing the reader to understand the comparisons being made. You use some topic-specific terms like 'proportion', 'activities', and 'commutation'. However, there are errors in word choice and collocation, such as 'engaged people in sleeping' and 'incline in hours spent'. These errors do not impede communication but show a limited range of sophisticated vocabulary. To improve, focus on using more precise collocations and ensure that word forms are used correctly in context.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 6.0
The response contains a mix of simple and complex sentence structures. There are several grammatical errors, including subject-verb agreement issues ('The sets of pie chart compares', 'individual had spending') and tense inconsistencies ('seems to had risen'). While these errors are noticeable, they do not prevent the reader from understanding the main points. To achieve a higher score, work on consistent verb tense usage and ensure that complex structures are formed accurately without missing auxiliary verbs or incorrect verb forms.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.
