Band 7.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 7.5 · Recent IELTS Exams (Canada & India) · 2026-07-26
IELTS Writing Task 1 question
The pie charts below show how working adults in a particular country spent their time in 1958 and 2008.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
* Note: these aren’t the original diagrams given in the test, they were recreated for the purpose of demonstration.
Student answer (Band 7.5)
The pie charts compares the percentage of the day spent by working adults on various activities in the year 1958 and 2008.
Overall, it can be seen that the highest percentage of time was spent at work by working professionals in both the years.
Initially, 33 percent of the day was spent while working by the working adults which increased significantly to 42% in 2008. The sleeping hours for the adults has decreased by 7 percent from 32% in 1958 to 25% in 2008. However, the figure for relaxing at home has increased from 8 percent in 1958 to 13 percent in 2008.
In 1958, 19 percent of the daytime was spent in outings by the adults which reduced to less than half in 2008. The time for travelling to work was only 2 percent initially which surged to 7 percent in 2008. Almost similar time was spent while playing sports in 1958 and 2008.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 7.5 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 7.5 |
| Lexical Resource | 7.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 7.0 |
| Overall | 7.5 |
Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 7.5
The response covers all key features of the pie charts, including the most significant changes over the fifty-year period. You successfully identified the primary trends, such as the increase in work hours and the decrease in sleep. The overview is clear and provides a good summary of the data. To reach a higher band, ensure that all comparisons are fully supported by data; for instance, when mentioning that time for outings reduced to 'less than half', explicitly stating the figures (19% to 8%) would provide more precision. Overall, the task is well-addressed with a clear focus on the main trends.
Coherence and Cohesion — Band 7.5
The response is logically organized, with a clear introduction, an overview, and body paragraphs that group information effectively. You use cohesive devices such as 'Initially', 'However', and 'In 1958' to guide the reader through the data. The progression of ideas is smooth, moving from work-related activities to leisure and travel. To improve, consider using a wider variety of linking phrases to connect sentences, as some transitions feel slightly repetitive. Paragraphing is used appropriately, and the information is presented in a way that is easy to follow.
Lexical Resource — Band 7.0
You demonstrate an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, using terms like 'surged', 'significantly', and 'various activities' appropriately. There is a good attempt to use topic-specific language. However, the vocabulary is somewhat functional rather than sophisticated. To improve, try to incorporate more precise collocations or synonyms to avoid repeating 'working adults' or 'percentage'. For example, instead of 'the figure for relaxing', you could use 'the proportion of time allocated to leisure'. The current range is sufficient to convey meaning clearly without significant errors.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 7.0
The response contains a mix of simple and complex sentence structures. There are some grammatical slips, such as subject-verb agreement errors ('The pie charts compares' should be 'compare') and minor phrasing issues ('in both the years' should be 'in both years'). Despite these, the meaning is always clear, and the errors do not impede communication. To achieve a higher score, focus on eliminating these small slips and aim for more varied complex sentence structures, such as using relative clauses or participle phrases to combine information more fluidly.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.
