Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Recent IELTS Exams (Canada & India) · 2026-09-07
IELTS Writing Task 1 question
The pie charts below show how working adults in a particular country spent their time in 1958 and 2008.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
* Note: these aren’t the original diagrams given in the test, they were recreated for the purpose of demonstration.
Student answer (Band 6.0)
The pie charts illustrates comparison between, how working adults in a particular country spent their time in 1958 and 2008.
Overall, in both the years working adults spent their most of the time working followed by sleeping. However the time spent for going out with friends and family reduced in 2008 compared to 1958.
In 1958, though working adults spent 33% percent of their time working, they spent 33% sleeping and 19% going out with friends or family. Only 8 % of time they spent relaxing at home and approximately 6% on playing sport. They spent their 2% of time for traveling to work.
However, in 2008, this figures changed considerably. Time spent on working became 42% and time spend relaxing at home become 13%. Time spent on going out with friends and family and playing sports reduced to 6% and 7% respectively. Meanwhile they spend their 28% of their time sleeping and 13% relaxing at home.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 6.0 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 6.0 |
| Lexical Resource | 6.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 6.0 |
| Overall | 6.0 |
Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.0
You have successfully identified the main features of the charts and made relevant comparisons between the two years. You provided a clear overview and supported your points with data from the charts. However, there are some inaccuracies in the data reporting. For example, you mention 'relaxing at home' twice in the final paragraph with different percentages (13% and 13%), and the data for 2008 appears slightly inconsistent with the provided figures. To improve, ensure that your data extraction is precise and that you do not repeat information, as this impacts the clarity of your summary.
Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.0
The response is organized into logical paragraphs, with an introduction, an overview, and two body paragraphs. You use cohesive devices such as 'However', 'Meanwhile', and 'In 1958' to guide the reader. While the overall progression is clear, some transitions feel slightly mechanical. The referencing is generally clear, but the repetition of information in the final paragraph disrupts the flow. To reach a higher band, focus on using a wider variety of cohesive devices and ensure that each sentence adds new information rather than repeating previous points.
Lexical Resource — Band 6.0
You demonstrate an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, using terms like 'considerably', 'respectively', and 'proportion'. However, there are some errors in word choice and collocation, such as 'this figures changed' (should be 'these figures') and 'time spend' (should be 'time spent'). The vocabulary is functional but lacks the sophistication required for higher bands. To improve, focus on using more precise collocations and ensure consistent verb forms when discussing data trends.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 6.0
You use a mix of simple and complex sentence structures. There are several grammatical errors, such as 'The pie charts illustrates' (subject-verb agreement error) and 'in both the years' (unnecessary article). Additionally, there are punctuation errors, such as the comma after 'comparison between'. While these errors do not prevent the reader from understanding your meaning, they occur frequently enough to limit your score. Focus on subject-verb agreement and proofreading for minor slips in tense and article usage.
See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.
