Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Recent IELTS Exams (Canada & India) · 2026-10-09

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The pie charts below show how working adults in a particular country spent their time in 1958 and 2008.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

* Note: these aren’t the original diagrams given in the test, they were recreated for the purpose of demonstration.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

The given pie charts illustrate the proportions of the day spent by working adults on numerous activities between 1958 and 2008.

Overall, day spent on working demonstrated maximum percentage throughout the period, while in 1958, travelling to work showed least percentage and in 2008, going out with friends and family accounted for minimum percentage.

In 1958, working activity accounted for 33%, which was followed by the sleeping at 32%. In addition, activity of going out with friends and family showed 19 percent of adults day spenta. As well as relaxing at home displayed 8%. The proportion of travelling to work showed minimum percentage of day spent was 2%.

In 2008, working depicted the maximum percentage of adults day allocate at 42%. Sleeping was the second activity which is high spent by adults was 25%. Similarly, relaxing at home displayed incline number of percentage over the period that was 13%. Playing sports and travelling to work at same proportion in this period to 7%. Moreover, going out with friends and family activity revealed least percentile of adults day spent was 6%.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5

You cover both years and report the main categories with mostly accurate figures, including the rise in working from 33% to 42%, the fall in sleeping from 32% to 25%, and the sharp decline in socialising from 19% to 6%. The overview also identifies the highest and lowest categories in each year, giving the reader a useful summary. This is a relevant and generally complete response, though some comparisons are less fully developed: for example, you could explicitly contrast the increases in working, travel and relaxing with the decreases in sleeping and going out. The 2008 sports figure is included, but its absence from the 1958 chart could be made clearer. A more synthesised overview and fuller comparison would strengthen the report.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The response has a clear overall structure: an introduction and overview are followed by separate paragraphs for 1958 and 2008. This makes the information easy to locate, and sequencing within each year is generally understandable. You also use linking expressions such as “In addition,” “Similarly” and “Moreover.” However, some connections feel mechanical or do not show a precise relationship, as in “Similarly” before the increase in relaxing at home. The repeated listing of categories also limits comparison across the two years. A few sentences are difficult to follow because their ideas are crowded together, particularly the sentence about sports and travelling both being 7%. Grouping increases and decreases across years, and using clearer links between comparisons, would make progression more flexible.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use a range of task-related vocabulary, including “proportions,” “accounted for,” “displayed” and “revealed,” and the reader can generally identify the activities and figures being described. However, several choices are unnatural or imprecise, such as “maximum percentage,” “incline number of percentage,” “least percentile,” and “adults day allocate.” These expressions make the report less fluent and occasionally obscure the intended meaning. There is also an apparent typing error in “day spenta.” Aim for accurate, natural collocations rather than repeatedly substituting synonyms for “showed”: for example, use “the largest share,” “increased,” or “accounted for the smallest proportion” where appropriate. More precise phrasing would improve clarity and control.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt both simple and more complex sentence forms, and the overall meaning is usually recoverable. The opening and overview show an effort to summarise the charts, while the year-by-year paragraphs include several comparisons. However, some grammatical errors recur, especially with articles, possessives and sentence construction. Examples include “day spent on working” and “adults day spenta,” where the possessive form is needed, and “the second activity which is high spent by adults was 25%,” which has an unclear clause structure. Tense and agreement are also inconsistent in phrases such as “relaxing at home displayed incline number.” These errors sometimes make individual sentences difficult to process. Practise concise patterns such as “Working accounted for 33% of the day” and “The figure for sleeping fell to 25%.”

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.