Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Recent IELTS Exams (Canada & India) · 2026-10-15

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The pie charts below show how working adults in a particular country spent their time in 1958 and 2008.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

* Note: these aren’t the original diagrams given in the test, they were recreated for the purpose of demonstration.

Student answer (Band 5.0)

The provided line graph tracks the information about the how working adults in a particular country spent their time in 1958 and 2008.

Overall, it is evident that, the highest percentage of a day spent on working in year of 2008. Whereas, the lowest percentage of time spent on travelling to workin 1958.

To begin with, the highest percentage of day spent by workers on sleeping in 1958 was recorded 32%. Whereas the lowest percentage of day spent on travelling to work was observed 2%. After this, 33% adults spent thier day on working in 1958 while 8% on relaxing at home. Moreover, adults consume thier day to going out with friends/ family was accounted for 19%.

However, in the 2008, the highest percentage of adults spent day on working was measured 42%. Whereas, the lowest spent on going out with friends and family near about 6%. After this, adults consume day on travelling to work and playing sports was similar 7%. Moreover, 25% adults spent on sleeping and 13% on relaxing at home.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.0

You report several key figures accurately, including working at 33% in 1958 and 42% in 2008, sleeping at 32% and 25%, and travel at 2% and 7%. You also identify the main extremes: work was highest in 2008, while travel was lowest in 1958. However, the overview is brief and does not clearly summarise the broader changes, especially the sharp fall in going out with friends or family from 19% to 6%, or the addition of sports at 7% in 2008. The response mainly lists figures rather than selecting and comparing the most significant features, so coverage of the task remains partial. Develop a clearer overview and explicitly compare the major rises and falls.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.0

The response has a basic structure, with an opening, an overview, and separate paragraphs for the two years. This helps the reader distinguish the data for 1958 from that for 2008. However, progression within the paragraphs is mostly a sequence of figures, and the repeated transitions “Whereas,” “After this,” and “Moreover” feel mechanical rather than showing clear relationships between the information. Some sentences also begin with “Whereas” without being connected to a complete main clause, which interrupts the flow. Organise the details around meaningful comparisons—for example, grouping activities that rose and those that fell—and use a wider range of accurate linking and referencing to make the progression clearer.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use relevant vocabulary for describing charts, including “percentage,” “recorded,” “observed,” and “accounted for,” and the activity labels are generally clear. However, the range is limited and several expressions are repetitive or imprecise, such as “spent day on” and “consume their day to going out.” There are also spelling errors in “thier” and the joined form “workin,” which reduce accuracy. The opening calls the visual a “line graph,” although it is a pair of pie charts; this is an important word-choice error. Use precise chart language and natural collocations, such as “the proportion of time spent working” or “the share devoted to travel,” and check spelling carefully.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt some complex sentence forms, including clauses beginning with “Whereas” and “while,” but these are often not controlled successfully. For example, “Whereas, the lowest percentage of time spent on travelling to workin 1958” is a fragment rather than a complete sentence, and “the highest percentage of a day spent on working in year of 2008” lacks a clear grammatical structure. Articles and prepositions are also frequently missing or misplaced, as in “in the 2008” and “spent on sleeping.” The repeated simple reporting patterns limit grammatical range, while errors sometimes make relationships between ideas harder to follow. Practise complete comparisons with a clear subject and verb, and check articles, tense, and sentence boundaries.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.