Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Recent IELTS Exams (Canada & India) · 2026-10-27

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The pie charts below show how working adults in a particular country spent their time in 1958 and 2008.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

* Note: these aren’t the original diagrams given in the test, they were recreated for the purpose of demonstration.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

The pie charts illustrates the routine of working adults in a particular country in 1958 and 2008.

Overall, the working hours has increased and it is also the highest activity; however, the lowest in the first chart is travelling and in the second chart it is going out.

To begin with, working in both the years dominates in 1958 it accounts for 33% which increased by 42% in 2008. The second activity which accounts more is sleeping in 1958 it is 32% but it declined in 2008 by 25%. The same type of drop is seen in going out with friends or family in 1958 it represents 19% and in 2008 at 6%.

Furthermore, people started to relax more at their home over the time as in 1958 it accounts for 8% and which rose in 2008 by 13%. Travelling to work also increased slightly from 2% to 7% in 2008 and playing sports also accounts for 7%. It is clear that over the period adults are more engage in working than sleeping however they started spending more time to relax at their home.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5

You identify the main overall changes accurately: working rises from 33% to 42%, while sleeping and socialising fall, and you note that travelling and relaxing increase. The overview also correctly identifies working as the largest category and distinguishes the smallest categories in each year. These relevant comparisons address the task, although some details are less fully developed: playing sports is mentioned only as 7% in 2008, without noting that it is absent from the 1958 chart, and the overview could summarise the broader shift more precisely. To strengthen the response, compare the main increases and decreases directly and clarify that the figures represent proportions of the day, rather than “working hours.”

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The response has a clear overall arrangement: an introduction and overview are followed by two paragraphs comparing the figures. Sequencing expressions such as “To begin with” and “Furthermore” help signal the progression, and the reader can generally follow the comparisons. However, some sentences combine several facts without clear boundaries, particularly “The second activity which accounts more is sleeping in 1958 it is 32% but it declined…” This makes the relationship between ideas less smooth. The final sentence also repeats points already made rather than adding a distinct concluding insight. Use clearer sentence divisions and more precise links between each comparison; this would make the progression more consistently controlled.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.0

You use an adequate range of task-related vocabulary, including “accounts for,” “declined,” “increased,” and “represents,” so the main trends are understandable. There are also attempts to vary phrasing, such as “drop” and “rose.” However, some choices are imprecise or awkward for describing chart data: “routine” is broader than the chart’s focus on time allocation, “working hours has increased” does not accurately name the proportion, and “the second activity which accounts more” is unclear. Phrases such as “relax at their home” and “more engage in working” also show limited control of natural collocations and word forms. Aim for precise terms such as “share of the day” and “accounted for.”

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt both simple and more complex structures, including contrast with “however” and clauses introduced by “as,” and the meaning is usually recoverable. Some grammatical errors remain, though: “The pie charts illustrates” has subject–verb disagreement, and “the working hours has increased” also mismatches the plural subject and verb. Several comparisons are joined without appropriate punctuation or clause structure, as in “in 1958 it accounts for 33% which increased by 42% in 2008.” The phrase “it accounts for 8% and which rose” is also structurally faulty. Check agreement, use past-tense forms consistently for the historical data, and separate complete clauses with suitable punctuation. These corrections would improve accuracy while preserving your range of sentence forms.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.