Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Recent IELTS Exams (Canada & India) · 2026-11-10

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

In many countries not enough students are choosing to study science at university. What are the causes of this? What effects does it have on society?

Give reasons for your answer and include relevant examples from your knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

It is widely acknowledged that in many nations fewer learners likely to choose science subjects at university . Although there are several reasons why students not prefer to learn science such as high competition and to much workload pressure, it mainly puts effects on community like shortage of scientists or slow technological development and economic consequences.

One of the main cause of this development is that science is very difficult subject because it have numerous methods as well as strategies to learn any thing, due to this learners need to spend a huge time on study. Undoubtedly, if students put their majority time on their education, not only it can break learners interest but also it puts pressure on students lives. Furthermore, nowadays, everyone know the value of science subjects as it helps them to make great career while providing several job opportunities. Indeed, sometimes, students think that this subject has high competition, the prefer to choose another subjects like arts. Therefore, science is difficult subject, many peer can not like to choose it.

Nevertheless, this trend has some drawbacks especially on society like if students can not tend to choose science, they face shortage in scientists, as a result slow technological development is become main reason of this development. It is irrefutable that if individuals have less advance technology, they can soo many problems in their daily life. Coupled with, if fewer students choose science subjects, industries may face a shortage of skilled professionals. For this reason, productivity may decline, businesses may struggle to innovate and economic growth may slow down.

In conclusion, even though science subject is difficult and students have lack on interest, individuals have less technology along with they face many problems in everyday life.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

The response addresses both parts of the question: it identifies perceived difficulty, workload and competition as reasons, then discusses shortages of scientists, slower technological development and possible economic effects. These points are relevant, and the link between fewer science graduates and reduced innovation is a useful central idea. However, some causes are not fully explained: for example, the claim that science offers many career opportunities sits alongside the claim that students avoid it because of competition, but the relationship between these ideas is unclear. The effects on everyday life are also asserted rather than illustrated with a specific example. Develop each main point with a clearer explanation or example, and make the connection between causes and effects more explicit.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The essay has a recognisable overall structure, with an introduction, a paragraph on causes, a paragraph on effects and a conclusion. Sequencing is generally understandable, and connectors such as “Furthermore,” “Therefore” and “For this reason” help signal relationships. However, some links are mechanical or unclear: “Therefore, science is difficult subject, many peer can not like to choose it” does not clearly show how the ideas connect, and “Coupled with” is not used naturally to introduce the next point. The conclusion also repeats the main ideas without clearly summarising the argument. Use fewer, more precise linking expressions and ensure each paragraph develops one clear line of reasoning, with references that make the relationships between ideas easy to follow.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

The response uses a relevant range of topic vocabulary, including “workload pressure,” “technological development,” “skilled professionals,” “productivity” and “economic growth.” These choices help communicate the main argument. However, inaccurate word choice and collocation sometimes make the meaning less clear, as in “puts effects on community,” “have lack on interest” and “face shortage in scientists.” There are also spelling or form errors such as “soo” and “advance technology,” alongside repeated use of general words such as “students,” “science” and “problems.” Build precision by learning common academic word partnerships and checking word forms and spelling. More accurate phrasing would make the ideas sound clearer and more natural without requiring unusually advanced vocabulary.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

The essay attempts a mix of simple and complex structures, including conditional clauses (“if students put their majority time…”) and a correlative construction (“not only… but also…”). This shows an effort to vary sentence forms. However, some grammatical errors recur and occasionally make relationships difficult to follow. Examples include “students not prefer” instead of a correctly formed verb phrase, “science is very difficult subject” without an article, and “slow technological development is become” with an incorrect verb form. Subject–verb agreement and plural forms also need attention, as in “everyone know” and “another subjects.” Practise accurate present-tense clauses, articles and agreement first, then check longer sentences for complete, correctly connected clauses and punctuation.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.