Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Recent IELTS Exams (Canada & India) · 2026-08-23

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

In many countries not enough students are choosing to study science at university. What are the causes of this? What effects does it have on society?

Give reasons for your answer and include relevant examples from your knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

Science plays a crucial role in the development of modern society by contributing to technological innovation, healthcare and economic growth. However, In several nations only fewer students are opting science at university. They may find this stream to be highly difficult, lack of practical exposure at universities or find other better career opportunities in other fields. In this essay, I will discuss the compelling reasons why students not prefer to choose science. Also, share my view that how it could effect our society.

To begin with, first and primary reason is that Science often requires strong mathematical, analytical and problem-solving skills. Students may feel that subjects such as physics and chemistry are harder than other university courses. Also, they prefer other career opportunities such as influencers, content writers, software technician are more demanding, reliable and required less technical knowledge as compare with Science subjects. For example, A student who struggles with mathematics may prefer business, arts or management courses.

In addition to this, in small cities universities are not well equipped with laboratories which also impacts on their knowledge. As they score good in academics but they don't posses industrial exposure as compare with other student's who studied from reputed universities. Hence, the above-mentioned factors are the main causes of this trend.

On the other hand, there are several drawbacks if more people are not choosing science and looking after for essay subjects. The one significant reason is the shortage of researchers and scientists. Not choosing science, leads to lack of medical researches such as new vaccines, medicines for critical diseases and lower the environmental research. scientists are the foundation of new technological advancements. For instance, If there is a shortage of scientific professionals, countries may struggle to develop new technologies and compete with other nations. Countries may become more dependent on importing advanced technologies from abroad.

In conclusion, science often demands creative, problem-solving skills and more calculations which may students find difficult to pursue for longer period of time. However, if more students moving far away from this trade then our nation will surely face shortage of skilled researchers. Therefore, government should impose wide variety scholarship programs and workshop for science student's who currently completing their higher studies. These creative workshops helps to lead their mind into more interesting side.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.0

The response addresses both parts of the prompt: causes and effects. The ideas are relevant, such as the perceived difficulty of science subjects and the lack of laboratory facilities. However, the development is somewhat uneven. The discussion on causes is clearer than the effects, which could be more deeply explored beyond just the shortage of researchers. The introduction is slightly repetitive, and the conclusion introduces a new idea (government scholarships) that was not previously discussed, which is a minor structural weakness. Overall, the position is clear, and the response covers all requirements of the task.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.0

The essay is logically organized into paragraphs, each with a clear focus. Cohesive devices are used, such as 'To begin with', 'In addition to this', and 'On the other hand', which help guide the reader. However, some transitions are mechanical or slightly awkward, such as 'looking after for essay subjects' (which seems to be a misuse of 'essay' as a synonym for 'arts'). Referencing is generally clear, though some sentences are slightly disjointed. Paragraphing is used appropriately to separate the causes from the effects, contributing to a coherent flow of ideas throughout the text.

Lexical Resource — Band 6.0

The vocabulary is generally adequate for the task, allowing the writer to express ideas clearly. There are attempts to use topic-specific vocabulary like 'technological innovation', 'industrial exposure', and 'scientific professionals'. However, there are several instances of imprecise word choice and collocation errors, such as 'opting science' (should be 'opting for science'), 'not prefer to choose' (redundant), and 'looking after for essay subjects' (incorrect usage). While these errors do not impede communication, they prevent the essay from reaching a higher band score. A wider range of precise academic vocabulary would improve the score.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 6.0

The essay uses a mix of simple and complex sentence structures. While the meaning is generally clear, there are frequent grammatical errors, particularly with articles ('the' missing before 'Science'), subject-verb agreement ('may students find'), and pluralization ('student's' used incorrectly as a plural). Punctuation errors, such as the unnecessary capitalization of 'In' after a comma, are also present. While the writer attempts complex structures, the frequency of these minor errors indicates a lack of full control. The sentences are generally understandable, but the accuracy needs improvement to reach the next band.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.