Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Recent IELTS Exams (Canada & India) · 2026-09-01

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

In many countries not enough students are choosing to study science at university. What are the causes of this? What effects does it have on society?

Give reasons for your answer and include relevant examples from your knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

In the modern era, science has an indispensable part in human life. Through science only technology has flourished in all sectors. But, in many nations students are unwilling to pursue science subject at university. There are several personal and other factors might influence the younger minds and it has some negative consequence on society.

To commence with, the every first reason is many students find science is challenging subject because it only content significant amount of theory which sometime make students exhausted and bored. Thus, students might not like to choose this subject. In addition to this, students must to cultivate some attributes like critical thinking, logical reasoning and problem solving skill and many more which is quite challenging for students. Without such skills students may struggle during writing thesis, conducting experiments, reading research papers and many more. Further, some university prioritize theory portion much rather then performing sciences experiments. As a result, students cannot understand complex topics and discourage them to study sciences.

Consequently, it has negative impact on the society. Firstly, science is closely linked with innovative technology. With the help of science healthcare improve significantly. People can access good quality of medical treatment such as development of vaccines, advances medical equipment which diagnosis disease at primary stage. Apart from this, people also communicate easily with their kith and kin through smartphones regardless of location. Moreover, sciences make education even more convenient. If student will not study then society could not get innovative products and services which make people life more relaxing.

To recapitulate, if science subject was not taught then we could not have reputed scientists who contributed valuable things to society and science. No doubt this subject seems tedious because it contains lots of theory and exceptions but studying and teaching this subject differently then it become interesting. Without science society will suffer because people become habitual with automatic and electronic gadgets for everything.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 5.5

The response addresses both parts of the prompt: the causes for the decline in science students and the societal effects. The ideas are relevant, such as the perception of science as 'challenging' and the reliance on theory over practical application. However, the development of these ideas is somewhat limited. For instance, the discussion on societal effects focuses heavily on technology and healthcare but could be more nuanced regarding long-term economic or research impacts. The position is clear throughout, but the depth of analysis remains at a general level rather than fully exploring the implications of the trend.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.0

The essay is logically organized into paragraphs, each with a clear focus. Cohesive devices are used, such as 'To commence with', 'In addition to this', and 'Consequently', though some transitions feel slightly mechanical or repetitive. The progression of ideas is generally clear, although the connection between sentences within paragraphs could be smoother. For example, the transition between the difficulty of science and the lack of practical experiments is a bit abrupt. Overall, the paragraphing is appropriate, and the reader can follow the argument without significant difficulty.

Lexical Resource — Band 5.5

The vocabulary is generally adequate for the task, allowing the writer to convey their meaning clearly. There are attempts to use topic-specific vocabulary like 'innovative technology', 'medical equipment', and 'critical thinking'. However, the range is somewhat limited, and there are instances of awkward word choice or minor errors, such as 'science subject' instead of 'science subjects' and 'make people life' instead of 'make people's lives'. The use of less common lexical items is infrequent, and some phrasing is repetitive, which prevents the response from reaching a higher band.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.5

The essay uses a mix of simple and complex sentence structures. While the meaning is generally clear, there are frequent grammatical errors, particularly with subject-verb agreement ('science is challenging subject'), article usage, and verb forms ('students must to cultivate', 'If student will not study'). Punctuation is generally functional, but there are errors in sentence construction that occasionally require the reader to re-read for clarity. The range of structures is sufficient to communicate the ideas, but the frequency of errors in basic grammar prevents a higher score.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.