Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Recent IELTS Exams (Canada & India) · 2026-09-28
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
In many countries not enough students are choosing to study science at university. What are the causes of this? What effects does it have on society?
Give reasons for your answer and include relevant examples from your knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 5.5)
It is an ongoing debate amongst people of certain countres that students now a days do not consider science related programs at university level. there are several reasons for this popular trend and it has some bad consequences on the community as well as for the development of one's nation. This essay will discuss both views
Firstly, high fee and other educational expenditures are both major factors in influencing a schlor mind. As in this contemporary era institutions demand unbearable finances that can be difficult to handle for a learner. As a result students may abandon to take part in science field.For instance, an engineering field requires to deposit high fee then all the other departments which cannot be sometime possible to pasy. Secondly complexity is another case for not paying
attention towards such disciplines .These fields can be mastered with lot of struggle and dedication but one may not want to do hardwork. Eventually it may
cause in lossing interest
Beside this, there are numerous drawbacks of this which can really be harmfull for country. abolishing science field may result in reduction of engineers, doctors
and developers. This will effect community in any problematic situation as these experts are obvious in every area in order to deal with obstacles. For instance, if a person got injured but if he do not find any doctor in city it will lead to serious outcome. Similarly, a country may not develop if it does not have professionals in the field of technology and science. Because in this era several nations are progressing with the help of their residents like AI learners and doing wonders by utilizing them. So not taking part in such occupatons may lead to whole country distruction.
In conclusion, heavy burden of expensis and difficulty of scientific studies can diminish interest-rate between scholars this may negatively effect on community by limmiting the supply of such experts as well as it will not be fruithful for the state.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 5.5 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 5.5 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.5 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.0 |
| Overall | 5.5 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5
The response addresses both parts of the prompt, exploring the causes behind fewer students choosing science (high tuition costs and perceived academic difficulty) and the societal effects (shortage of doctors and engineers, potential national underdevelopment). The position is clear throughout the essay, and ideas are extended, such as explaining how a lack of medical professionals impacts emergency situations. However, some arguments tend to over-generalise, and the phrase 'This essay will discuss both views' at the end of the introduction is inaccurate since the prompt asks for causes and effects, not two differing opinions. Despite this minor misstatement in the introduction, the content successfully addresses the core prompt, fulfilling the requirements for Band 6.5, rounded to Band 6.0 due to limited development in places.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5
The essay is divided into logical paragraphs, with an introduction, two body paragraphs addressing causes and effects respectively, and a conclusion. Cohesive devices are used, such as 'Firstly', 'Secondly', and 'Beside this', though some transitions feel a bit mechanical or unnatural. Paragraphing is generally appropriate, and there is a clear overall progression. However, referencing and cohesion are sometimes faulty, as seen in phrases like 'Beside this, there are numerous drawbacks of this which can really be harmfull'. Furthermore, the transitional flow between sentences occasionally feels abrupt. The organizational structure is coherent overall, earning a Band 6.0.
Lexical Resource: Band 5.5
The student uses an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, attempting some less common items such as 'contemporary era', 'expenditures', and 'professionals'. However, there are numerous spelling and word choice errors throughout the text, including 'countres' instead of countries, 'schlor mind' instead of scholarly mind, 'pasy' instead of pay, 'lossing' instead of losing, 'harmfull' instead of harmful, 'distruction' instead of destruction, 'expensis' instead of expenses, and 'limmiting' instead of limiting. While these errors are frequent, they rarely impede communication completely because the intended meaning can still be understood. This performance aligns with the Band 5.5 descriptor.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0
The writer attempts a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, demonstrating some control over structure. However, grammatical accuracy is weak, with frequent errors in punctuation, capitalization, subject-verb agreement, and prepositions. Examples include 'students now a days do not consider', 'an engineering field requires to deposit high fee then all the other departments', 'complexity is another case for not paying attention', and 'if he do not find any doctor'. Furthermore, sentence boundaries and capitalization at the beginning of sentences are frequently neglected. Because errors occur consistently and can cause occasional difficulty for the reader, this warrants a Band 5.0.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.