Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Recent IELTS Exams (Canada & India) · 2026-09-30
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
In many countries not enough students are choosing to study science at university. What are the causes of this? What effects does it have on society?
Give reasons for your answer and include relevant examples from your knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 5.0)
In this modern era, the rapid increase in why not enough students are choosing science field as their career in university has become a major talking point globally. This phenomena is primarily driven by a couple of core factors, and it results in several significant consequences for society. This essay will examine the root cause of this trend and outline its primary impacts.
To begin with, there are several key reasons behind this growing trend. The primary contributor is high academic pressure and rigor, which often pushes individuals or institutions to adopted complex laboratory work, intense memorization and advance mathematical applications, which can overwhelm some students. Furthermore,another major catalyst is neglection of humanities and ethical context . When people face this specific pressure, it naturally leads them to creating ethical dilemmas regarding data privacy and genetic enginneering , making it a widespread practice in daily life.
Consequently, this development triggers a series of profound effects on society. On one hand, it often results in technological development,which ultimately disrupts moral oversight.On the other hand, a more concerning impact is rapid innovations in biotechnology , potientially creatig long-term challenges for the communties by outpaced government regulations if proactive measures are not taken.
To sum up, not choosing science area as study field by students is primarily caused by factors like fosters innovation additionally technological advancement and it sebsequently brings about notable consequences such as automated weaponization and privacy-invading surveillance. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for managing the trend efectively in the future.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 5.0 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 5.0 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.0 |
| Overall | 5.0 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.0
The response attempts to address both parts of the prompt regarding the causes of fewer students studying science and the effects on society. However, the development of ideas is often confused and contradictory. For instance, the essay claims that academic pressure causes students to create 'ethical dilemmas regarding data privacy and genetic engineering', which lacks logical clarity. Furthermore, the conclusion mischaracterizes the causes and effects by stating that not choosing science is 'caused by factors like fosters innovation additionally technological advancement'. While a position is presented and all parts of the prompt are touched upon, the arguments are frequently muddled and under-developed, aligning best with a Band 5.0.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.0
The essay is divided into four standard paragraphs, providing a basic structure. However, the logical progression between sentences and ideas is frequently disrupted by confusing statements and mechanical or inaccurate cohesive devices. For example, transition phrases like 'On one hand' and 'On the other hand' in the third paragraph do not effectively contrast balanced points. Referencing is occasionally unclear, such as 'This phenomena' in the introduction referring forward rather than backward, and pronoun use lacks precision. Paragraphing is present, but the overall progression of thought is hindered by logical leaps and awkward phrasing, placing this criterion at a Band 5.0.
Lexical Resource: Band 5.0
The student attempts to use some less common vocabulary, such as 'phenomena', 'catalyst', and 'surveillance'. However, there are numerous inappropriate word choices and collocations, such as 'neglection of humanities' instead of 'neglect of the humanities', and 'potientially creatig' which highlights both spelling and lexical inaccuracies. There are also frequent spelling and typographical errors throughout the text, including 'enginneering', 'sebsequently', and 'efectively'. While the vocabulary is minimally adequate to convey a general topic, the noticeable errors in word formation, spelling, and collocation limit the lexical score to a Band 5.0.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0
The response displays a mix of simple and complex sentence structures, but attempts at complex sentences frequently contain grammatical errors or awkward syntax. Examples of structural and grammatical flaws include 'the rapid increase in why not enough students are choosing science field' and 'pushes individuals or institutions to adopted complex laboratory work' (incorrect verb form). Punctuation and spacing errors are also prevalent, such as missing spaces after commas and periods. Frequent errors in verb agreement, tense consistency, and preposition usage cause some difficulty for the reader, resulting in a Band 5.0 for grammar.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.