Band 6.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 6.5 · Recent IELTS Exams (Canada & India) · 2026-10-08
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
In many countries not enough students are choosing to study science at university. What are the causes of this? What effects does it have on society?
Give reasons for your answer and include relevant examples from your knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 6.5)
Science is considered a fundamental course in education, many students nowadays prefer other programs offered by universities over science. This trend can be due to a few reasons such as insufficient financial capabilities and the possible future work-related opportunities. The situation paves way to some unfavorable effect.
In detail, choosing a program to pursue is really subjective. It depends whether a student is highly interested, matched the qualifications and of course financial status. Science related programs are expensive. This is one of the reasons why a student chooses other subjects that are suitable with their available educational funds. Additionally, another factor is that employement rate is not as impactful as that of business management courses. This is a valid driver for students to pursue other studies that can eventually secure them a stable and good paying job. Majority of the students have a similar goal in mind and that is to have a position with higher compensation.
However, the decline in studying science transcends a bigger problem in the corporate world. This has a negative effect as the workforce would highly experience an imbalance amongst the availability of applicants. For example, most of the fresh graduates would saturate the business management and financial industries leaving the research and development side with limited options. It would be a big problem because limited man power limits the capabilities of further exploring and unfolding breakthroughs in research. Fresh graduates provide impactful insights and challenges previous studies that are vital in development.
In conclusion, decreasing students enrolling for science maybe due to financial limitations and work opportunities. This would also affect the society in general as the imbalance in qualified graduates creates a significant gap.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 6.5 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 6.5 |
| Lexical Resource | 6.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 6.0 |
| Overall | 6.5 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5
You address both parts of the question and maintain a clear overall position: you identify financial constraints and perceived employment prospects as causes, then explain how fewer science graduates could limit research and development. The example of graduates concentrating in business and finance helps make the societal effect concrete. This meets the task well, but the causes are not equally developed: the claim that science programmes are expensive would benefit from an explanation or example, and the comparison of employment rates is asserted rather than supported. The effects discussion is more developed, though it focuses mainly on research capacity; explaining another wider consequence, such as shortages in healthcare or technology, would make the response more complete and developed.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5
The response has a clear overall structure: an introduction, a paragraph on causes, a paragraph on effects, and a conclusion. The progression from students’ choices to consequences for research is easy to follow, and signposts such as “Additionally,” “However,” and “In conclusion” help guide the reader. Some linking is mechanical or imprecise, however. “In detail” does not clearly signal the move into the causes, while “This” in “This has a negative effect” could refer more explicitly to the decline in science enrolment. The conclusion repeats the main points but adds little synthesis. To strengthen cohesion, use more precise referencing and connect each example directly to the claim it supports.
Lexical Resource: Band 6.0
You use an adequate range of topic-related vocabulary, including “financial status,” “employment rate,” “research and development,” and “breakthroughs.” These choices allow you to discuss both student decisions and social consequences. There are also attempts at more formal phrasing, but some word choices and collocations are inaccurate or unnatural, such as “paves way,” “employement rate is not as impactful,” and “unfolding breakthroughs.” The spelling error in “employement” also affects accuracy. Some expressions, including “big problem” and “good paying job,” are relatively general for this discussion. Aim for precise academic collocations and check spelling; this would make your vocabulary more flexible and natural without changing your clear meaning.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 6.0
You use a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, including conditional and subordinate structures such as “It depends whether a student is highly interested…” and “because limited man power limits…”. Most ideas remain understandable, but some grammatical errors persist. The opening joins two independent clauses with a comma: “Science is considered a fundamental course in education, many students…”; use a full stop or a suitable conjunction. There are also issues with agreement and verb forms in “matched the qualifications” and “Fresh graduates provide impactful insights and challenges previous studies.” The final sentence, “This would also affect the society…,” has an unclear grammatical reference to the preceding idea. Review clause boundaries, parallel verb forms, and agreement to improve accuracy while retaining your sentence variety.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.