Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Recent IELTS Exams (Canada & India) · 2026-10-15

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

In many countries not enough students are choosing to study science at university. What are the causes of this? What effects does it have on society?

Give reasons for your answer and include relevant examples from your knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

The global shift towards non-science studies, accelerated by technological advancements and the pandemic, have significantly transformed the study culture at universities. This change may have several impacts on our society in terms of reducing numbers of engineers and doctors and . This essay will explore the main reasons and effects of students' losing interest in science.

One of the major reasons why less students are choosing to study science at university is technological advancements. People are indeed interested in technology and prioritise to learn computer's effective competencies because it is the requirement of modern industries these days. Another factor is the competition in engineering, healthcare, and other scientific fields; people are profoundly struggling to get suitable jobs. For example, numerous skilled workers from Pakistan have moved to abroad because of less employment opportunities there.

There are several effects of this development on our society. First of all, reduction in numbers of professionals who work in public sectors. Many hospitals and educational institutions need professional workers, as well as governments need engineers to work for the development of their country. Another impact would be less discoveries and researchs on environment, ecosystem, and others. If universities promote science studies and encourage their learners to gain knowledge, they would be able do amazing discoveries in future and influence other generations too.

In conclsuion, reason of not choosing science at university is because computer studies is prevalent nowadays and undergraduates are more interested in modern AI skills. These skills broaden employment opportunities, however there is more competition for science graduates. It may have negative impact on society inlcuding less numbers of skilled workers at public sectors and discoveries.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

You address both parts of the question and maintain a relevant focus on causes and social effects. The discussion of competition for jobs and the possible shortage of professionals is pertinent, and the Pakistan example gives one cause some support. However, the causes are not fully explained: the link between technological advances and students avoiding science is unclear, especially as computer skills can themselves be part of science study. The pandemic is mentioned in the introduction but not developed later. Effects such as fewer discoveries are relevant, but need a clearer explanation of how this would affect society. Develop each main point with a specific cause-and-effect link and a more precise example.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The response has a clear overall structure: an introduction, separate paragraphs for causes and effects, and a conclusion. Sequencing is generally easy to follow, and signposts such as “Another factor” and “First of all” help identify the progression. This meets the lower-band expectation of coherent organisation and shows some of the flexibility associated with stronger cohesion. However, some links between ideas are abrupt or unclear. For instance, the move from technological interest to students choosing non-science subjects needs an explicit explanation, while the conclusion introduces AI skills without having developed them in the body. The opening sentence also contains an unfinished phrase (“and .”), which interrupts flow. Make paragraph links more precise and ensure the conclusion summarises points already established.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use a range of topic-related vocabulary, including “employment opportunities,” “professionals,” “public sectors,” and “discoveries,” so the main ideas are generally understandable. There are also attempts at more formal phrasing, such as “technological advancements” and “profoundly struggling.” However, word choice and collocation are often inaccurate or unnatural, which limits precision: “prioritise to learn,” “moved to abroad,” and “less discoveries” do not express the intended meanings naturally. Spelling errors such as “conclsuion,” “inlcuding,” and “researchs” also detract from control. Aim for accurate, natural combinations of words and check spelling and plural forms carefully; this will make your relevant vocabulary more effective.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt both simple and complex sentence forms, including a conditional sentence beginning “If universities promote science studies…” and a relative clause in “workers who work in public sectors.” Most of the message remains understandable, which is a strength. Some grammatical errors nevertheless recur. In the opening, the plural subject “shift” is followed by “have”; “less students” should use a plural count noun form, and “they would be able do” is missing “to.” There are also article and number issues in phrases such as “reduction in numbers” and “have more competition.” The unfinished “and .” is a punctuation problem. Review subject–verb agreement, articles, countable nouns, and infinitive patterns, then proofread each sentence for completeness.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.