Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Recent IELTS Exams (Canada & India) · 2026-10-17

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

In many countries not enough students are choosing to study science at university. What are the causes of this? What effects does it have on society?

Give reasons for your answer and include relevant examples from your knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

Choosing career options is one of the most pressing issues facing by many students nowadays. This statement has led to numerous consequences, such as students might divert their interest into distinct field as per their preferences. This essay will examine the root causes of this statement and propose adequate effects on societies well being.

One of the primary causes of students not to study science curriculum is lack of interest and dedication towards the field. In other words, students are likely to be more interested in unique field which incubates their curiosity. For instance, a student who wants to be a social activist will tend to prefer humanities subject curriculum which helps them to gain profound knowledge on general knowledege and art activities. As a result, pupils can showcase their innovative skills and talent towards the field they are mostly capable to depict. Another most prominent cause for this is science subjects are considerably difficult, coerces students to require more efforts. This means that students would likely to choose subjects which are quite resonable and requires minimal efforts. For instance, a pupil may find physics subject much harder that his parents would prefer to alter his stream rather than forcing unconciously.

The rearmost coherent factors to be considered which cannot be neglected is effects on today's modern societies. There are adequate effects of this stance which are substainable. To commence with, in future we could face shortage of scientists and researchers which could have a devasted impact on science and technological aspects. In other words, not having enough students opt for science stream will directly proportional to minimizing researchers and scientists in technological era. Another most compelling effect of this is society and higher authorities may find extensive drawbacks to cope up with rapid exapnsion of innovation and additionally societies may struggle to propound adequate solutions to address their daily routine problems.

Succinctly, although students who largely favours to choose independent subjects such as business studies, architecture have undoubtedly profound benefits. They are not insurmountable. However, choose to contribute remedies in technological era would immensely helpful. Higher authorities should take proactive steps to proliferate better future.

AI examiner evaluation

CriterionBand
Task Achievement / Task Response6.0
Coherence and Cohesion6.0
Lexical Resource5.5
Grammatical Range and Accuracy5.5
Overall6.0

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

You address both parts of the question: lack of interest and the perceived difficulty of science are presented as causes, while a future shortage of scientists and weaker capacity to respond to technological change are identified as effects. These points are relevant, and the examples about a student choosing humanities and a pupil finding physics difficult help illustrate the causes. However, the effects are less fully explained, and the conclusion shifts towards remedies and the benefits of other subjects rather than clearly summarising your answer. Some claims, such as society struggling to solve everyday problems, would be stronger with a specific example or clearer explanation of the link to fewer science graduates. Develop each main idea more precisely and keep the conclusion focused on the causes and effects.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a clear overall structure, with an introduction, a paragraph on causes, a paragraph on effects and a conclusion. The reader can generally follow the progression, and signposts such as “For instance” and “As a result” help connect examples to claims. However, some transitions feel mechanical or do not accurately describe the relationship between ideas: “The rearmost coherent factors” is unclear, and “Succinctly” introduces a conclusion that then moves to remedies. References such as “this statement” and “this stance” are also vague because the exact idea they refer to is not always clear. Use simpler, more precise linking phrases and make each paragraph’s central point explicit.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You attempt a range of topic-related vocabulary, including “dedication,” “researchers,” “technological aspects” and “proactive steps.” This gives you resources to discuss both causes and social consequences. However, several less common expressions are inaccurate or unnatural, which makes some sentences difficult to interpret: “incubates their curiosity,” “rearmost coherent factors,” “effects … which are substainable” and “proliferate better future.” There are also spelling errors, including “knowledege,” “resonable” and “exapnsion.” These issues show that ambitious vocabulary is not yet consistently controlled. Prefer familiar, precise collocations, check spelling carefully, and use less common words only when you are confident they fit the meaning.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You use both simple and complex sentence forms, including relative clauses such as “which helps them to gain…” and conditional phrasing such as “in future we could face…”. The main ideas are usually understandable, but some grammatical errors affect clarity. For example, “students not to study science curriculum” needs a more accurate construction, and “students would likely to choose” has an incorrect verb pattern. In “not having enough students opt for science stream will directly proportional,” the clause and verb structure are incomplete; a clearer form would be “a decline in science enrolment will be directly proportional to…”. Review articles, verb patterns, agreement and sentence completeness, while continuing to vary your structures.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.