Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Recent IELTS Exams (Canada & India) · 2026-10-19

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

In many countries not enough students are choosing to study science at university. What are the causes of this? What effects does it have on society?

Give reasons for your answer and include relevant examples from your knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

In many countries, fewer students are choosing to study science at university.This is a concerning trend because science plays an important role in the development of modern society and also modern lifestyle of human being.There are several reasons for this situation ,and it can have negetive effects on society.In the upcoming paragraphs will see the reasons and how it impacts the society.

One major reason is that science subjects are often considered difficult.Students need strong mathematical,analytical and problem solving skills to understand complex scientific concepts.As a result,they prefer easier subjects such as business management.Anoyher reason is that some students are worried about future job opportunities and salaries.They may feel that studying science requires several years of education,while other degrees can provide batter career prospects in a shorter time in compared to science degree.In addition,a lack of practical experiments and modern laboratory facilities in some schools can make science less interesting to young learners.

This trend can create serious occurance in society.Firstly,there may be a shortage of qualified professionals,such as doctors,nurses,scientists.This could affect the quality of healthcare in particular country.Secondly,fewer science graduates may reduce a countries ability to solve major problems,including climate change and new diseases or pendamic like covid 19.For examples,without enough skilled researchers it may take longer time to resolve a major concerns.Furthermore,countries who have less skilled researchers more likely to depend on other nation crucial dicisions and that affects the whole economic growth.

In, conclusion,the main reasons why fewer students feel hard to understand science subjects and also a carrer stress and lack of practical knowledge.This trend could lead to serious shortage of skilled professionals.Therefore,goverments and schools should make science more captivating to attract more students to choose skilled courses.

AI examiner evaluation

CriterionBand
Task Achievement / Task Response6.5
Coherence and Cohesion6.5
Lexical Resource5.5
Grammatical Range and Accuracy5.5
Overall6.0

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5

You address both parts of the question and maintain a clear focus on why students avoid science and what this means for society. The causes are relevant: perceived difficulty, concerns about career prospects, and limited laboratory experience. You also explain effects, including shortages in healthcare and research and greater dependence on other countries. These points support the task response well. However, some effects are asserted rather than fully explained—for example, the link between dependence on other nations and “the whole economic growth” needs a clearer causal explanation. The conclusion also introduces “lack of practical knowledge” without clearly distinguishing it from the earlier point about facilities. More specific examples or fuller explanation of these ideas would make the response more consistently developed.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The response has a clear overall structure: an introduction, a paragraph on causes, one on effects, and a conclusion. The progression from reasons to consequences is easy to follow, and signposts such as “One major reason,” “Firstly,” and “Furthermore” help guide the reader. This gives the essay a coherent arrangement. At times, however, linking is mechanical, with several points introduced in a list-like sequence rather than connected through explanation. Some references are also unclear, such as “that affects the whole economic growth,” where the reader must infer what “that” refers to. The opening and conclusion could connect more directly to the body’s main points. Use cohesive devices more flexibly and make references explicit to strengthen progression.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use relevant topic vocabulary, including “analytical,” “scientific concepts,” “qualified professionals,” “climate change,” and “researchers,” which helps communicate the main ideas. There is also an attempt to use more formal language appropriate to the topic. However, noticeable spelling and word-choice errors reduce precision, including “negetive,” “Anoyher,” “batter,” “occurance,” “pendamic,” and “dicisions.” Some combinations are unnatural or unclear, such as “serious occurance in society,” “career stress,” and “in compared to science degree.” These errors do not prevent the reader from understanding the overall argument, but they limit the range and control of vocabulary. Check spelling carefully and learn common academic collocations as complete phrases.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt both simple and more complex sentence forms, including cause-and-effect structures such as “As a result” and conditional phrasing such as “This could affect the quality of healthcare.” The main meaning is generally understandable. However, some grammatical errors recur in sentence construction, articles, agreement, and punctuation. For example, “In the upcoming paragraphs will see” lacks a subject, while “a countries ability” has incorrect agreement and possessive form. In “countries who have less skilled researchers,” the relative clause is not well formed, and “In, conclusion” has faulty punctuation. Several sentences also run words together after full stops. Review sentence boundaries, articles, and singular/plural agreement, while continuing to practise complex structures with accurate forms.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.