Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Recent IELTS Exams (Canada & India) · 2026-11-02

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

In many countries not enough students are choosing to study science at university. What are the causes of this? What effects does it have on society?

Give reasons for your answer and include relevant examples from your knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

In many countries only limited students are interested in studying science at university. There are many causes such as the study at university is expensive besides students are bohr of outdated cirriculum. However, it effects the decrease in experts of science field.

The main reason for the students not showing interest in science is the cost of education is very expensive at university. Especially, a lot of donations are taken to provide a seat at the medical college. Not everyone can spend the money for education at university resulting, the count of students who choose science at university had decreased. On the other side, the cirriculum used at universities are outdated also the tough subjects make students to divert to other fields rather than science.

The possible effects of these causes result in deplenition of experts especially in the field of science. Government should encourage talented students with scholorships and stipends. Encouragement from the government create interest to students, study in science. This result in building of science experts in our country. Moreover, the old cirriculum has to be updated. New technologies and theories are to be incorporated allowing the students to stay updated. Adopting to new technologies a student can take any type of challenge easily.

In conclusion, alot of students are not showing interest to study science in university due to its outdated cirriculm and its expensive education. However, it results in fall of experts in science field that can be takled by encouraging talented people and rewising the cirriculum.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

You address both parts of the question: you identify high university costs and outdated curricula as causes, then explain that society may have fewer science experts. The response also offers relevant remedies, such as scholarships and updating course content. These ideas are on topic, but some are less fully developed than others. For example, the point about medical-college donations is specific, yet you do not explain how outdated teaching discourages students beyond saying that subjects are tough. The societal effect is also stated mainly as a decline in experts, without showing what this means for areas such as healthcare, research, or technology. Develop each cause-and-effect link with a clear explanation or example to make the response more complete.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a clear overall arrangement: an introduction, a paragraph on causes, one on effects and possible responses, and a conclusion. This makes the main line of argument easy to follow. You also use signposting such as “The main reason,” “Moreover,” and “In conclusion.” However, some connections are mechanical or unclear. “On the other side” does not accurately introduce a second cause, and “This result in building of science experts” has an unclear reference. The effects and recommendations are combined in one paragraph, which weakens the progression from explaining consequences to proposing solutions. Use more precise transitions and keep each paragraph focused on one stage of the argument.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use relevant topic vocabulary, including “outdated curriculum,” “scholarships,” “stipends,” and “new technologies,” so the reader can understand the subject. However, the range is limited and several noticeable spelling, word-form, and collocation errors reduce precision. Examples include “bohr” for “bored,” “deplenition” for “depletion,” “scholorships,” and “rewising.” Some phrases are also unnatural, such as “the count of students” and “divert to other fields.” Aim to use accurate academic collocations and check spelling carefully. More precise wording would help distinguish the causes, such as tuition costs and outdated course content, from their consequences for scientific expertise.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and more complex sentence forms, including a cause-and-effect construction with “resulting” and a sentence beginning “Adopting to new technologies.” The overall meaning is generally understandable, but some grammatical errors remain. For example, “the cost of education is very expensive” has an awkward grammatical construction; “the curriculum used at universities are outdated” has subject–verb disagreement; and “Encouragement from the government create interest” also needs agreement. Articles and sentence structure are sometimes inaccurate, as in “study in science.” Work on agreement, complete sentence patterns, and accurate clause connections. These improvements would make your ideas clearer while preserving the range of structures you are attempting.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.