Band 6.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.5 · Recent IELTS Exams (Canada & India) · 2026-11-04

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

In many countries not enough students are choosing to study science at university. What are the causes of this? What effects does it have on society?

Give reasons for your answer and include relevant examples from your knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.5)

In the contemporary world, many people are enrolling in non- scientific courses in their universities. This essay will discuss the major causes of this primarily the limited career opportunties and financial security as well as the effects it have on society such as decline in the number of researchers to assist new inventions and lack of skilled technicians.

To begin with, majority of science subjects only offer limited career opportunities to the graduated individuals. Unlike other courses where individual can get secured employment offers after graduation, science field often demand higher qualitfications such as masters and ph.D for pursuing a job with decent salary. Consequently, students prefer to study courses which make them eligible to get quick-paying jobs inorder to achieve financial security at an early age. For example, graduates in courses such as Bsc physics and chemistry mostly pursue higher qualifications and end up working as a lecturer or scientist, while some students study new era courses such as digital marketing and receive diverse career options.

Furthermore, society can be negatively affected by the trend of decline in students in science field. Most of the existing problems are solved with the aid of scientific approach and research outcomes. If students choose not to study science, labs and reseach sectors may lack enough workers. Skilled workers to operate machineries will be reduced which can adversely affect industries . Moreover, a world where science is diminishing can create a place for supersitions . For instance, vaccinations for preventing various diseases are produced as a result of long researches by scientists and decrease in science students can ultimately affect the future of such researches as well.

In conclusion, lack of career opportunities and desire for financial security at young age is forcing students to prefer non- scientific courses over science related courses and this can adversely affect society as researches will be at halt without scientists and technical skills would eventually deterorate in the future.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 7.0

The response addresses both parts of the question and maintains a clear focus: it identifies limited career prospects and the desire for early financial security as causes, then explains possible social effects, including fewer researchers and technicians. The examples about science graduates pursuing further study and vaccination research help support these points. The explanation of causes is reasonably extended, while some effects are less fully developed: for instance, the claim that declining science study could create space for “superstitions” is asserted rather than explained, and the impact on industries could be made more specific. Overall, the main ideas are relevant and supported, but developing each consequence with a clearer causal link would make the response more complete and persuasive.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 7.0

The essay has a clear overall structure, moving from an introduction to causes, effects and a conclusion. Paragraphs have identifiable central purposes, and signposting such as “To begin with,” “Furthermore” and “In conclusion” helps readers follow the progression. The examples are generally placed where they support the relevant point. Some connections, however, are broad or slightly mechanical: “Furthermore” introduces a shift from causes to effects, while the relationship between the shortage of science students and the rise of superstition is not fully linked. The conclusion repeats the main points but could synthesise them more precisely. To strengthen cohesion, use transitions that express the exact relationship between ideas and make references such as “this trend” explicit.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.0

The response uses an adequate range of topic vocabulary, including “career opportunities,” “financial security,” “scientific approach,” “research outcomes” and “skilled workers.” These choices make the main argument clear, and there are attempts at more specific terms such as “digital marketing” and “vaccinations.” However, some word choices and collocations are inaccurate or awkward, including “limited career opportunities to the graduated individuals,” “quick-paying jobs” and “researches” when referring to research as a general activity. Spelling errors such as “opportunties,” “qualitfications” and “supersitions” also reduce accuracy. Aim for more natural academic collocations and check spelling and word forms carefully; this would make the vocabulary more precise without requiring unnecessarily complex wording.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 6.0

There is a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, including conditional structures such as “If students choose not to study science…” and a relative clause in “courses which make them eligible…”. Most sentences remain understandable, but some grammatical errors occur. Examples include missing articles in “majority of science subjects” and “science field,” subject–verb agreement in “the effects it have,” and an awkward construction in “science field often demand.” The final sentence also has a singular subject followed by “is forcing” while listing two causes, which makes the agreement unclear. Review articles, agreement and sentence construction, especially in longer sentences. More consistent control of these patterns would improve accuracy while preserving the range already attempted.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.