Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 5.0 · IELTS Predictions Nov 2026 · 2026-11-09
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
Some people believe that work should offer social interaction as well as income, while others think that socialising with colleagues should take place outside work.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 5.0)
The Communication between one person to another plays an important role to make healthy relationships. Some individuals argue that the place of work provides social interactions with income, on the other hand, others realize that the relationships between the employees should be outside of th work communities. In my openion, social interactions between the workers is important for company's healthy environment however it should be in a limited manner. In this essay, we will discuss both the views with relevent reasons.
First and foremost, according to the first argument that working place provide both social interactions as well as income. It is true in some extent, as large number of people working together for a company to acheive their particular goals and they also interact with each other to make their tasks easy and reliable. Additionally, It is most importantly, it helps to create the healthy and comfortable environment between employees. For instance, if workers of the organisations do not communicate with each other, they became in stress of work easily and do not work hard to complete their targets.
In the contrast with, some people believe that social interaction among colleagues should take place outside the working area is good for the company. Employers of the company wants their goals accomplished, for this, they demand proper attentions on work to completed targets without any type of distractions. For example, if employees give theior 100% to their works , employer giev them rewards afterwards they can interact with thue co worker outside the work.
To conclude, if some people believe it is important to interact with others at working place is advantageuous for the company. On the other hand, people make their relationships with their colleag
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 5.0 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 5.0 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.0 |
| Overall | 5.0 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.0
You address both views and state a qualified opinion: workplace interaction is beneficial, but should be limited. The first body paragraph explains that communication can make tasks easier and create a more comfortable environment, while the second gives the opposing concern that socialising may distract employees from targets. These points are relevant, but they remain general and are not developed with clear, specific reasoning or a convincing example. The conclusion also becomes incomplete: “people make their relationships with their colleag…” does not finish your final position or summarise the discussion. Develop each view with a fuller explanation and a relevant example, then end with a complete, consistent statement of your opinion.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.0
The response has an identifiable introduction, two body paragraphs presenting opposing views, and a conclusion, so the reader can recognise the intended structure. However, progression within paragraphs is sometimes unclear, and several linking expressions are inaccurate or mechanical. For example, “In the contrast with” does not introduce the second view naturally, while “Additionally, It is most importantly” combines connectors without a clear relationship. The final sentence is cut off, leaving the conclusion without a complete ending. Use simpler, accurate transitions such as “By contrast” and “Furthermore,” and make sure each paragraph develops one main point in a logical sequence. Clear references to the ideas already introduced would also help the argument flow.
Lexical Resource: Band 5.0
You use vocabulary relevant to the topic, including “social interactions,” “comfortable environment,” “distractions,” and “accomplished.” There are also attempts at more formal phrasing, but word choice and collocation are often inaccurate or repetitive, which can make meaning less clear. Examples include “working place provide,” “proper attentions on work,” and “give their 100% to their works.” Spelling errors such as “openion,” “acheive,” and “relevent” are noticeable, and “th work communities” appears to contain a typing error. Build a more reliable range of workplace collocations and check spelling carefully. Prefer precise, natural phrases over formal-sounding expressions that do not fit the sentence.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0
You attempt both simple and complex sentences, including clauses beginning “if” and “as,” but control is inconsistent. Errors in agreement and verb forms occur in phrases such as “working place provide,” “Employers … wants,” and “they became in stress.” Sentence construction is also faulty in “according to the first argument that working place provide…” and “social interaction … should take place outside the working area is good.” Articles, plurals, and punctuation are not consistently controlled, and the unfinished final sentence prevents the conclusion from being grammatically complete. Practise building clear subject–verb–object sentences first, then add subordinate clauses. Proofread each sentence for agreement, complete structure, and punctuation.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.