Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 6.0 · IELTS Predictions Nov 2026 · 2026-11-09
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
Some people believe that work should offer social interaction as well as income, while others think that socialising with colleagues should take place outside work.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 6.0)
Whether to socialise with colleagues at workplaces or outside is a controvercial issue. Some people think that interaction with co-workers should be limited to offices. Any socialisation with co-workers should be kept separate and outside of work, while others believe that we should extend good relationships with our colleagues at workplaces. Both these perspectives have their pros and cons. I think that workplace provides us the opportunity to make good relationships and we should extend these relations and friendships with colleagues, mainwhile maintaining a hierarchy of our position.
On the one hand, many people think that socialisation with collegues should be dealt separately outside the work environment. Strict professionalism and hierarchy is essential to maintain a dicipline at workplace. Friendships and socilisation with collegues poses many complications affecting work. Moreover, social interactions during work may also promote discrimination and bisness in decisions. In addition, sometimes friedships may result in racism in worse case scenarios. Therefore, most organisations discourage socialisation beyond a limit among co-workers to enhnace workplace dicipline and productivity.
On the other hand, supporters of socialisation at workplaces including myself support the view that we should have good relationships along with work. I believe that working environment provides us opportunity to earn and make good relations simultaneously. This is because when we are working as a team in harmony and care for each other we may become more productive. Friendships at offices help us understand each others problems better consequently helping each other and managing the situation in better ways. For example, If some of our collegues has young kids with pick and drop problem from school, we can better understand her problem and help her resolve her issue by giving her cover when she want to dpick her children from school. Ultimately, this result in more flexible workenvironmnet and better concentration at work and consequently better productivity.
In conclusion, I think socialisation at work place is far much better than avoiding interactions and behaving like robots.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 6.5 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 6.5 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.5 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.5 |
| Overall | 6.0 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5
You address both views and state your own position clearly: you support building good relationships at work while maintaining professional hierarchy. The two body paragraphs give relevant reasons, including concerns about discipline and biased decisions, and the example of covering for a colleague with childcare responsibilities helps illustrate the benefits of workplace relationships. This meets the task well, though some points are asserted rather than fully explained. For instance, the claims that workplace socialising may lead to discrimination or racism would be stronger with a clearer explanation of how this happens. Your conclusion restates your preference, but could briefly weigh the two views before confirming it. More precise development of these ideas would make the response more complete and persuasive.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5
The response has a clear overall structure: an introduction, separate paragraphs for the two perspectives, and a conclusion. The progression from the risks of workplace socialising to its benefits is easy to follow, and signposts such as “On the one hand,” “On the other hand,” and “In conclusion” help orient the reader. Some connections are less smooth or precise, however. For example, “Moreover,” “In addition,” and “Therefore” stack several points in the first body paragraph without showing clearly how each claim relates to the next. The long example in the second body paragraph also contains several linked consequences, making its progression harder to track. Use cohesive devices more selectively and make references between ideas explicit to improve flow.
Lexical Resource: Band 5.5
You use a relevant range of vocabulary for the topic, including “strict professionalism,” “hierarchy,” “discrimination,” “in harmony,” and “productivity.” These choices help communicate both the risks and benefits of social relationships at work. However, spelling errors and imprecise or unnatural word combinations are noticeable, such as “controvercial,” “dicipline,” “business in decisions,” and “workenvironmnet.” There is also repetition of “socialisation,” “colleagues,” and “workplace,” and some phrases are not idiomatic, including “dealt separately outside the work environment.” These issues do not prevent the main message from being understood, but they limit precision and naturalness. Check spelling carefully and practise collocations such as “maintain discipline” and “make decisions impartially.”
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5
You attempt a mix of simple and complex structures, including clauses with “while,” “because,” and “when,” and most ideas remain understandable. Some grammatical errors nevertheless affect accuracy. For example, “when we are working as a team … we may become more productive” is followed by a long sentence with unclear clause boundaries, while “If some of our colleagues has …” has a subject–verb agreement error. In “when she want to …,” the verb form also needs to agree with “she,” and “this result in” requires a matching singular verb. Articles and plural forms are sometimes inconsistent, as in “a discipline” and “each others problems.” Aim to control agreement and sentence boundaries, especially in longer examples, while retaining your attempts at complex sentences.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.