Band 4.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 4.5 · IELTS Predictions Nov 2026 · 2026-11-10

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people believe that work should offer social interaction as well as income, while others think that socialising with colleagues should take place outside work.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 4.5)

The data demonstrates that some people argue about social intereaction should allow in work while others beleive that hangouts with staff should be in outdoors rather than in work.

During working hours interaction with staff for a while should be necessary because thats help them to reduce stress of workload and help them to gain confidence.

Similarly, chill with colleagues after work also have many advantages like they can talk freely and drink whatever they want.

Lets talk first argument, during work hours staff feel very pressure from their employers and go under stress due to extra workload which affect their health very badly. So they could nochill in this compound environment But providing them cool environment help them to reduce stress and they can perfom better. For example, if company does not allow their employees to talk friendly so output of it will affect both of them. so company help their staff by giving them some break atleast 1 hour will be very beneficial for office.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 4.0

The response identifies both views: interaction during work is said to reduce stress, while socialising after work allows colleagues to talk freely. However, the discussion is only partial. Most of the essay develops the case for workplace interaction, and the opposing view receives just one brief sentence; there is no clear, sustained personal opinion answering which arrangement you support. The example about a company allowing friendly conversation is relevant, but its effect is asserted rather than explained. The response also contains 167 words, below the required 250, so several parts of the task remain insufficiently developed. To improve, state your position clearly, give each view a developed paragraph, and explain specific examples and their consequences.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 4.5

There is a basic attempt to organise the response: an opening introduces the two views, and the final paragraph begins to develop workplace interaction. Linking expressions such as “Similarly,” “So,” and “For example” show an effort to connect ideas. However, progression is limited: the essay moves quickly from a brief overview to “Lets talk first argument,” then ends without developing the second view or reaching a conclusion. Some links are unclear or awkward, and the example does not connect smoothly to the claim that breaks improve performance. Use separate paragraphs for the two views and your opinion, and make each paragraph follow a clear claim–explanation–example sequence.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

The vocabulary is sufficient to communicate the main topic, with relevant terms such as “workload,” “stress,” “confidence,” and “employees.” There are also attempts at informal expressions, including “chill with colleagues” and “talk freely,” but these are not consistently suitable for an academic essay. Several spelling and word-choice errors, such as “intereaction,” “beleive,” and “hangouts,” make the writing less polished, while “cool environment” is imprecise in this context. Aim for accurate, formal collocations and check spelling carefully. For example, describe “socialising with colleagues” and a “supportive workplace environment,” and use precise terms such as “take a break” rather than relying on conversational wording.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

The response attempts both simple and more extended sentences, including a reason clause in “because thats help them to reduce stress” and a conditional example beginning “if company does not allow.” However, the range is limited, and errors occur frequently enough to make some sentences difficult to follow. Examples include “interaction … should be necessary,” “thats help,” “staff feel very pressure,” and “which affect their health,” where agreement, verb forms, or sentence construction are faulty. Punctuation and sentence boundaries also need attention, particularly around “But providing them cool environment” and the final “so company” clause. Practise accurate subject–verb agreement and build longer sentences from clearly connected clauses.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.