Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · IELTS Predictions Nov 2026 · 2026-11-10

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people believe that work should offer social interaction as well as income, while others think that socialising with colleagues should take place outside work.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

Few people thinks that work should give opportunity for social interactions as well as pay, while other believes that socialising with co-worker should occur after work. There are two groups of school, both having different point of view about social activities during work time. I agree with thought of first group.

The first group of school thoughts is that social interaction is important during work as well as income because they think that work can be done in better way if social interaction is done between different workers at work place.For example, different mutlinational companies held seminers for their workers, so they can intrect with each other and understand the mentaility of each other. The main purpose of this act is that, they can perfome in better way.

While on the other hand, other workers think that social activites should be kept outside the work place. The main reason, behind this thought is that they want to perform their task without any disturbance. Such as, many people can perfome better when they are alone. Some worker can make better plan about their work,when no one is disturbing them.

In my opinion, social interaction is too much important during work for better performance. In every field of life, you need other people suggestions to perform better. Moreover, during hectic office routine social interaction is complusory for the piece of mind.

In my conclusion, socialising with co-worker is necassary for better life at job as well as income. But during work hour the workers have to focus on work rather than wasting their time by talking with surrounding people.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

You address both views and state your position clearly in the opening: “I agree with thought of first group.” The discussion of workplace interaction includes a relevant example of seminars and explains that colleagues may understand one another and perform better. You also give a reason for keeping socialising outside work: some people work better without disturbance. However, both arguments remain quite general, and the second view receives less explanation than the first. Your opinion that interaction is important is repeated, but the conclusion then adds that workers should focus rather than talk, leaving the practical balance between interaction and productivity unclear. Develop each view with a specific consequence or example, and make your final position consistent and precise.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

The response has a recognisable structure: an introduction, separate paragraphs for the two views, your opinion, and a conclusion. This helps readers follow the broad direction of the discussion. However, progression within paragraphs is sometimes weak, and linking phrases can feel mechanical or confusing. For example, “While on the other hand” combines two contrasting signals, while “In my conclusion” repeats the function of the preceding opinion paragraph without adding a clear synthesis. The final sentence also shifts from supporting workplace interaction to warning against talking, without explaining how these ideas fit together. Use simpler, accurate transitions and make each paragraph develop one main point through explanation and a relevant example.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use some vocabulary relevant to the topic, including “social interaction,” “disturbance,” “perform,” and “office routine,” so the main ideas are generally understandable. However, the range is limited and several word-choice, collocation, and spelling errors make the writing less precise. Phrases such as “groups of school,” “mentaility,” and “piece of mind” are unclear or inaccurate; the intended expressions may be “schools of thought,” “mindset,” and “peace of mind.” Repetition of “better” and “social interaction” also limits flexibility. Build a more accurate set of workplace expressions and check spelling carefully, especially for words used to explain your central arguments.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and more extended sentence forms, including a reason clause beginning “because” and a contrast between the two views. However, control is uneven, and errors in agreement, articles, plurals, and sentence construction occur frequently enough to make some sentences difficult to read. For example, “Few people thinks” should be “Few people think,” and “other believes” needs a plural subject and verb. In “The main reason, behind this thought is,” the comma interrupts the sentence, and “social interaction is too much important” uses an incorrect structure. Practise checking subject–verb agreement and article use, and build complex sentences around one clear main clause. More accurate sentence patterns would make your ideas easier to follow.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.