Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · IELTS Predictions Nov 2026 · 2026-11-13

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people believe that work should offer social interaction as well as income, while others think that socialising with colleagues should take place outside work.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

In todays fast-paced era, everyone is trying to become socialize for better exposure. Few individuals believe that their profession should provide social interaction along with their income, while critics argue that they become socialize with their colleagues from outside of their work-place. Both views have their own benefits, I firmly believe that socializing could be better take place outside the professionalism. In this essay, I will elaborate these points and conclude it with my own well-stated opinion.

On the one hand, supporters of the former view claim that they could get greater social-interaction at their jobs which can lead a healthy connection with their co-workers and improve their mutual understanding regarding their work. This is primarily because by having good understanding can improves their work productivity, they can help each others without any hesitation. Eventually, it will create a healthy environment for both professionally and socially. For instance, In an office, there are variety of skilled workers available in our surroundings, by having their company can improve our social understandings and enhance our productivity at work. Moreover, it can also improve our communication skills and become confident to confront any situation. Thus, being socialize at our own work-place can help a lot regarding several improvements in our personalities.

On the other hand, those who favor of the latter opinion present several arguments. Chief among these is that having frankness with our colleagues at office-place can impact badly on our work performances and also decrease our productivity. To elaborate, if people create a friendly environment in their offices, no one can take their instructions seriously which will create detrimental effects in their professional work. That is why, people should create their social community outside their workplace for better outcomes.

According to my opinion, I believe the aforementioned view can improves both productivity at work and confidence with better communication skill among our co-workers. The reason behind is that people have not such enough time in their routines to become socialize, they prefer to make a good relation with their colleagues during working hours. Which will bring satisfaction and comfortably environment in their professional lives.

To recapitulate, although proponents believes that people should interact with their co-workers during their working hours, others criticize with it and think they should create their social-community with their colleagues after their working hours. However, I certainly favor the former opinion for better personal and professional experience.

AI examiner evaluation

CriterionBand
Task Achievement / Task Response5.5
Coherence and Cohesion6.0
Lexical Resource5.5
Grammatical Range and Accuracy5.0
Overall5.5

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

You discuss both views and state a position, so the response is relevant to the task. The first main paragraph gives reasons for workplace socialising, including mutual understanding, productivity and confidence. However, the discussion is uneven: the opposing view is explained mainly through the claim that friendliness may make colleagues take instructions less seriously, with little support or qualification. Your own position is also inconsistent. The introduction and conclusion favour socialising outside work, but the opinion paragraph says you favour the view that socialising at work improves productivity and confidence. This makes your stance difficult to follow and limits the development of your ideas. Make your position consistent throughout, then explain and support each side with a specific example.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a recognisable structure: an introduction, separate paragraphs for the two views, your opinion, and a conclusion. Signposting such as “On the one hand,” “On the other hand,” and “To recapitulate” helps readers identify the stages of the discussion. Overall, the ideas are arranged coherently, but some connections are mechanical or unclear. For example, “Which will bring satisfaction” is a sentence fragment and its reference is not fully clear. The shift between the position in the introduction and the one in the opinion paragraph also disrupts progression. Develop a clearer link between each reason and its consequence, and use pronouns only when their reference is unmistakable. A consistent position would make the overall argument easier to follow.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You attempt a range of topic-related vocabulary, including “mutual understanding,” “work productivity,” “detrimental effects,” and “professional lives.” These choices show an effort to discuss workplace relationships beyond basic terms. However, inaccurate word forms and collocations are noticeable and sometimes make the meaning less natural, as in “become socialize,” “social understandings,” and “create their social community.” Some expressions are also imprecise, such as “frankness” for the degree of familiarity between colleagues. Aim for natural combinations and accurate forms, for example, “socialise,” “build rapport,” and “workplace relationships.” Proofread spelling and apostrophes as well: “todays” should be “today’s.” More precise, consistently natural phrasing would strengthen the argument.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and complex sentences, using clauses introduced by “because,” “if,” and “which.” However, control is inconsistent, and errors occur often enough to make some sentences difficult to process. Examples include “by having good understanding can improves,” where the subject and verb pattern are faulty, and “people have not such enough time,” which has an incorrect construction. There are also agreement and sentence-boundary problems, such as “proponents believes” and the fragment “Which will bring satisfaction.” Work on subject–verb agreement, articles, and complete sentence structure, especially when adding subordinate clauses. Shorter, accurately controlled sentences can help you express the same ideas clearly while you practise more complex forms.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.