Band 6.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.5 · IELTS Predictions Nov 2026 · 2026-11-09

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Many people make choices about work, education and where they live in the hope of building a better future. Everyone wants to be rich as it provides opportunities.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.5)

Nowadays people are becoming selective with respect to subject of their studies, career and place to live for a prosperous life. This approach has many advantages but is not without disadvantages. However, despite some setbacks, I agree with the view as I think that all these factors determine the future of an individual.

On the one hand, supporters of the view believe that money is a basic necessasity of life. Thinking of people in the modern world has changed significantly as compared to the past. In order to get better facilities of life Individuals plan their future with carful selection of highly demanded professional education so that they can secure a good salaried job. People move from rural areas to cities to acheive better education and job opportunities. This phenomenon is routinely observed especially in developing countries as as they have more insecurities of income. Many developing countries choose medical or engineering for their children to secure financial security in future. There is a significant increase in urban population all over the world pointing towards same trend.

On the other hand, critics think that people in modern world are becoming more materialistic and chasing money at the expense of their peace of mind. This trend make people suffer in terms of imbalance of work-life balance, poor relationship and abandoning their homeland for money. These people think modern mindset is enslaving people minds and they are actually loosing more than gain. The race of getting money has made society more selfish and there are more physical and mental health problems as compared to the past.

In conclusion, I think although there are many setbacks of trend of planning for money it provides many benefits if balance is maintained between personal and work life.

AI examiner evaluation

CriterionBand
Task Achievement / Task Response6.5
Coherence and Cohesion6.5
Lexical Resource6.0
Grammatical Range and Accuracy6.0
Overall6.5

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5

Your position is clear: you agree that choices about education, work and location can help people build a better future, while acknowledging costs such as stress and weaker relationships. The response addresses both sides and gives relevant examples, including moving from rural areas for opportunities and choosing medicine or engineering for financial security. This meets the task well, and the discussion shows some development. However, the prompt’s central claim is that everyone wants to be rich because wealth provides opportunities; your essay shifts somewhat towards planning for a prosperous life and does not directly examine whether everyone wants to be rich. Some claims, such as the rise in urban populations, are asserted rather than explained. Address the wording of the question more directly and develop one or two examples in greater depth.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The essay has a clear overall structure: an introduction, two contrasting body paragraphs and a conclusion. The progression from financial benefits to personal costs is easy to follow, and signposts such as “On the one hand,” “On the other hand” and “In conclusion” help readers navigate the argument. This is a coherent arrangement, though some linking is mechanical and a few connections are unclear. For example, “This phenomenon is routinely observed especially in developing countries as as they have more insecurities of income” does not clearly explain how the preceding point leads to the claim about insecurity. The conclusion also repeats the general balance-of-benefits position without drawing together the main reasons. Use more precise referencing and connect each example explicitly to the paragraph’s main claim.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.0

You use an adequate range of topic vocabulary, including “highly demanded professional education,” “financial security,” “materialistic,” and “peace of mind.” These choices allow you to discuss both economic opportunity and personal wellbeing, and some less common expressions show an effort to be precise. However, several word-choice, collocation and spelling errors reduce naturalness: “basic necessasity,” “carful selection,” “secure a good salaried job,” and “loosing more than gain.” “Insecurities of income” is also an awkward expression. Aim for accurate, natural combinations rather than adding complexity: for example, “financial insecurity” and “well-paid job.” Proofreading spelling and checking collocations would make your vocabulary more controlled while preserving the range you already attempt.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 6.0

You use a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, including a concession in “although there are many setbacks…” and a purpose clause beginning “so that they can secure…”. Most ideas remain understandable, and the errors do not generally prevent communication. Some grammatical problems are nevertheless noticeable. In “This trend make people suffer,” the singular subject requires “makes”; “poor relationship” needs a plural or determiner; and “the same trend” requires an article. The sentence beginning “This phenomenon…” also contains a duplicated “as,” while “balance of work-life balance” shows an awkward, repetitive construction. There are also inconsistent capitalisation and punctuation choices. Review subject–verb agreement, articles and plural forms, and edit sentences for clean, direct structure. More consistently accurate complex sentences would strengthen control.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.