Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · IELTS Predictions Nov 2026 · 2026-11-11

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Cyclists often have to share busy roads with cars and other vehicles. Some people argue that cyclists should pass a test before they are allowed to ride on public roads.

To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

Nowdays, cyclists often have to share bussy roads with many other vechicles. Some individuals debate that cyclists should pass a test before they are allowed to ride on bussy public roads. In my opinion, I totally agree that cyclists should pass a test before riding a bicycle on public road, as the test is for cyclist safety.

On the one hand, there should be a test about riding cycles on public, as many individuals are not used to public roads and they have no idea of heavy traffic on public roads. Many cyclists don't even know the basic rules of how to ride a bicycle on the main roads in between heavy vehicles. For example, when cyclists ride their cycles on a road they become confused and suddenly they get hitted by any other heavy or large vehicle. Many studies have shown that, there are thousands of accidents on road anually, in which cyclists are hitted by cars, trucks, and any other heavy vechicls and many cyclists die due to these accidents.

Similarly, the government should take some action for these cyclists and add some type of test for riding a bicycle on public roads otherwise the ratio of accidents will increase day by day and this will effect the local population living at a certain area. The traffic police should take riding test from cyclists and after taking test if the rider pass the test then the traffic police can give them a licence for riding a bicycle on public roads.

In conclusion, while there are alot of individuals arguing about test of cyclists for riding a bicycle on public roads, in my opinion, I totally agree that cyclists should pass a test before riding a bicycle on public road, as the test is for cyclist safety.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

Your position is clear from the introduction and conclusion: you agree that cyclists should pass a test before using public roads. You give relevant reasons, including unfamiliarity with traffic rules and the risk of collisions, and propose that traffic police issue licences after testing. However, the response develops these points only partially. The claim that cyclists become confused and are hit by vehicles is not explained with a specific example, and the reference to “many studies” gives no detail or evidence. The effect on the “local population” is also introduced without showing how it follows from the argument. Develop fewer points more fully and explain how a test would improve safety in practice.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

The response has a recognisable structure, with an introduction, supporting paragraphs and a conclusion, and the main position is easy to identify. The ideas generally relate to the topic, but progression is limited: the second body paragraph largely repeats the call for a test rather than adding a distinct, developed reason. Linking phrases such as “On the one hand” and “Similarly” signal connections, but “On the one hand” suggests a contrasting point that never appears, while “Similarly” does not clearly show the relationship between the paragraphs. The conclusion also repeats the introduction almost word for word. Use paragraphing to give each paragraph a clear purpose, and connect ideas through more precise references and transitions.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use enough topic-related vocabulary to communicate the central argument, including “heavy traffic,” “basic rules,” “accidents,” and “licence.” However, the range is limited and several words or phrases are repeated, especially “public roads,” “test,” and “cyclists.” There are also noticeable spelling errors, such as “Nowdays,” “bussy,” “vechicles,” “anually,” and “hitted,” which reduce accuracy and may slow the reader. Some expressions are imprecise or unnatural, including “the ratio of accidents” and “take riding test from cyclists.” Build a wider set of accurate collocations for road safety and testing, and proofread spelling and word forms carefully.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You communicate your main ideas using simple sentences and some longer structures, including a conditional construction: “if the rider pass the test then the traffic police can give them a licence.” However, the range is limited, and attempts to combine several ideas often produce errors. For example, “if the rider pass” needs subject–verb agreement, and “there are thousands of accidents on road” has an article and number-pattern problem. In “the test is for cyclist safety,” the noun phrase also needs more accurate grammatical marking. Punctuation is sometimes awkward, as in the comma after “shown that.” Practise accurate complex sentences, especially conditionals and clauses explaining cause and effect, then check agreement, articles and punctuation.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.