Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · IELTS Predictions Nov 2026 · 2026-11-11

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Cyclists often have to share busy roads with cars and other vehicles. Some people argue that cyclists should pass a test before they are allowed to ride on public roads.

To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

Cyclists often have to use the same roads with bustling traffic, as the cars and other automobiles. Some people argue that there should be a test for cyclists to allow them to ride on public roads. I agree with this statement because I think a lot of road accidents are caused by bicycle riders who do not know how to drive properly, or are unaware of their surroundings.

There should be a sort of exam for bicycle riders before they are allowed to ride on public spaces. This is because many of these riders do not follow the traffic rules or they simply do not have the knowledge of these rules. Many people using a cycle are under age and they are not much informed about the usage of cycle in a busy road. This results in dangerous accidents. For instance, many people ride bicycle carelessly because there are no restrictions with a cycle. If a permit is given to these people thet might be more aware of their responsibility as driving recklessly might lead to their permit being cancelled. Morever, the exam allows one to judge the person's cognitive skills and whether they can use a cycle or not.

Many people argue that there should be no test for using a cycle on road. They think that it should be a convinient form of transport and an exam is a mere waste of time. Because if exam is necessary, then people would prefer just using cars. For example, many underage people use cycle as a form of conveyance before they turn 18. A test might cause a hurdle for them especially if it is strict.

In conclusion, I think that bicycles should be used in public areas following proper rules and regulation. If a person knows the basics of travelling in a cycle, there is no harm in giving a simple test as it could eradicate the people who use this form of transport carelessly. And it would also put a responsibility on riders that if they do not ride properly it might result in termination of their permit.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

Your position is clear: you agree that cyclists should take a test, and you give relevant reasons, including knowledge of traffic rules, accident prevention, and accountability through possible permit cancellation. You also acknowledge the opposing view that testing could make cycling less convenient, with the example of young people using bicycles before turning 18. This addresses both sides of the question. However, some points are asserted rather than fully explained: for example, the claim that a test can assess “cognitive skills” is not clarified, and the counterargument is not followed by a detailed response explaining why safety should outweigh inconvenience. Develop these ideas with specific consequences or examples, and make your final position on how strict the test should be more explicit.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a coherent overall structure: an introduction states your view, the body paragraphs present supporting and opposing arguments, and the conclusion returns to your position. Paragraphing helps the reader follow the main stages of the discussion, and links such as “For instance” and “In conclusion” signal examples and closure. Some connections are less smooth or precise, however. The sentence beginning “Because if exam is necessary” is a fragment, and the relationship between the opposing view and your own response could be made clearer. Repeated references to “test,” “cycle,” and “permit” also make progression feel somewhat mechanical. Use clearer transitions to show contrast and response, and connect each example directly to the point it supports.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use enough topic-related vocabulary to communicate your argument, including “traffic rules,” “public roads,” “recklessly,” and “responsibility.” There are also attempts at more specific wording, such as “cognitive skills” and “termination of their permit.” However, several choices are inaccurate or unnatural, which limits precision: “use the same roads with” would be more naturally expressed as “share the roads with,” while “usage of cycle” and “conveyance” do not fit the context well. Spelling errors such as “thet,” “Morever,” and “convinient” are noticeable, and “bicycle,” “cycle,” and “riders” are repeated frequently. Aim for accurate collocations and vary references to cyclists and cycling where appropriate.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You use a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, including a conditional structure in “If a permit is given to these people…” and a relative clause in “who do not know how to drive properly.” Most of the argument remains understandable, but some grammatical errors and sentence-boundary problems are present. “Because if exam is necessary” is an incomplete sentence, and “Many people using a cycle are under age” has an awkward construction that affects clarity. Articles and number are also inconsistent, as in “if exam is necessary” and “rules and regulation.” The final sentence beginning “And it would also…” is a fragment linked loosely to the previous sentence. Review articles, singular/plural agreement, and complete sentence structure, while continuing to use varied clauses.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.