Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · IELTS Predictions Nov 2026 · 2026-11-13

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Cyclists often have to share busy roads with cars and other vehicles. Some people argue that cyclists should pass a test before they are allowed to ride on public roads.

To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

It is true that there is a lot of peoples riding cycles on roads or streets and they have to share busy roads with cars and other vehicles. some individuals argue that cyclist should also pass a test like other drivers do for driving license before they allowed to ride on public roads. while cars or motorbike owners needs to get a license before driving on public roads. Cyclists also should pass a test.

The main advantage of cyclist passing test before riding on roads will helps a lot in playig an important role in road side safety for cyclists and other peoples travelling on roads. many accidents occuring because of cyclists they do not have side mirrors or dont ride in their lines they also distract other vehicles on road by dangerously overtaking and turning without signals like if they have to make a u-turn they just turn without looking backside or do not have any indicators or siganls on their bicycles. for this goverment should make rule for cyclists they have to take some driving classes like other drivers attend and learn all the signals and safety rules of road that will help in understanding how to ride their bicycles on public roads and lower the chances of accidents on roadside.

The second thing is that if they attend these classes and pass this test that is also beneficial for theirselves and traffic departments also aware them about their bicycle safety kits like helmet and side mirrors are necessary and for night one headlight should be installed for clear visions in night.

In conclusion, I believes that it is a valid point cyclists should pass a test before riding on public roads it will decrease risk of accidents and ensures safety of theirselves and other peoples on the road.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5

Your position is clear from the introduction to the conclusion: you agree that cyclists should pass a test, and you give relevant reasons concerning road safety, signalling, and protective equipment. The examples of turning without checking and riding at night help make the argument concrete. This meets the task well, and the response also shows some of the stronger development expected at the next level. However, the discussion is not equally developed: the point about classes and safety kits is asserted rather than explained, and the essay does not consider a possible drawback, such as making cycling less accessible. Develop each reason with a clearer explanation or example to make the argument more fully supported.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a recognisable overall structure: an introduction states your view, two body paragraphs present reasons, and a conclusion restates your position. The progression from accident prevention to personal safety is generally logical. However, links between ideas are sometimes mechanical or unclear. For example, “The second thing” is a basic transition, while “for this” does not clearly connect the preceding examples to the proposed classes. Several ideas are crowded into long sentences, making their relationships harder to follow. Use topic sentences that identify each paragraph’s main claim, then connect explanations and examples with precise referencing and a wider range of natural transitions.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use enough topic-related vocabulary to communicate your main points, including “public roads,” “signals,” “accidents,” “helmet,” and “headlight.” Some phrases, such as “roadside safety” and “safety kits,” show an attempt to discuss the issue specifically. However, the range is limited and several word choices, collocations, and spelling errors reduce precision: “a lot of peoples,” “playig an important role,” “clear visions,” and “aware them” are not natural or accurate in context. Repetition of “roads,” “test,” and “safety” also limits flexibility. Build a more precise set of phrases for road rules and risk, and check spelling and collocations when editing.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and more extended sentence forms, including a conditional idea in “if they attend these classes and pass this test.” The overall meaning is usually recoverable, but control is inconsistent, and complex sentences often contain several errors. Examples include “Cyclists also should pass a test,” “before they allowed to ride,” and “I believes,” which show problems with word order, missing auxiliaries, and subject–verb agreement. Sentence boundaries and capitalisation are also unreliable, as in the lowercase “some” and “while” after full stops. Practise accurate clauses with subjects and verbs, and divide long sentences into shorter units. More consistent control of these patterns would make your argument easier to read.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.