Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 6.0 · IELTS Predictions Nov 2026 · 2026-11-14
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
In many countries, people are eating out more often than they used to, rather than preparing meals at home. Some people think people should cook at home more frequently.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 6.0)
Eating out has become a growing trend in recent years. I completely disagree with this practice because of its serious impacts on health and monetarily affects on household expenses.
The primary reason why I disagree with this view is the quality of meal in terms of nutrients is poor. This is because at food stalls meals are not prepared from fresh and organic material; additionally, they do not follow standard procedures during washing and storage. Another important point is, to make food fingers licking good, food suppliers use artificial spices and food colors; as a result, food has become source of some serious chronic illnesses.
Furthermore, monetarily affects on household budget also support my position. This is mainly because the cost of food when eating out is much higher as preparing meal at home. Currently, the whole world is suffering from financial stress and it also has an impact on personal earnings individually. Therefore, spending money on eateries would cause huge impact on household budget. In addition, food wastage is also worth considering. It has been observed that eating food points outside caused a remarkable food wastage, because of visual temptations, people usually order a large amount of due to its food but at the ended up with wastage of food.
To sum-up all the discussion that has been stated so far, I whole-heartedly disagree with the emerging trend of eating out rather than preparing meals at home because of its hazardous impacts on human health and its extra burden individual's budget.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 6.5 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 6.5 |
| Lexical Resource | 6.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.5 |
| Overall | 6.0 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5
Your position is clear from the introduction to the conclusion: you disagree with eating out more often and give two relevant reasons, health and household costs. The health paragraph includes supporting details about food preparation and additives, while the budget paragraph explains that restaurant meals cost more. This addresses the task and shows some development. However, parts of the support are broad or unclear: for example, the claim that food stalls do not use fresh ingredients or follow safe procedures is generalised, and the food-waste point is difficult to follow and not fully explained. To strengthen the response, develop each reason with a specific example or clearer explanation, and connect the food-waste point more directly to why people should cook at home.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5
The response has a recognisable structure: an introduction, two body paragraphs organised around health and cost, and a concluding summary. Linking expressions such as “Furthermore,” “Therefore,” and “In addition” help signal the direction of the argument. This gives the essay an overall coherent arrangement. Some connections, however, feel mechanical, and the final part of the second body paragraph is hard to follow: “people usually order a large amount of due to its food but at the ended up with wastage of food” does not make the relationship between temptation, ordering, and waste clear. The conclusion also repeats the main reasons rather than drawing them together. Use clearer referencing and transitions that show the precise relationship between ideas, and keep each paragraph focused on one developed line of reasoning.
Lexical Resource: Band 6.0
You use an adequate range of topic vocabulary, including “nutrients,” “chronic illnesses,” “financial stress,” and “food wastage,” and you attempt more expressive language such as “visual temptations.” These choices help communicate the main argument. However, several word choices and collocations are inaccurate or unnatural, including “monetarily affects,” “food fingers licking good,” and “at the ended up with wastage.” “Food suppliers” and “food points outside” are also imprecise in context. These errors do not prevent the reader from understanding your overall position, but they reduce precision and naturalness. Aim to learn common collocations for discussing health, costs, and eating habits, and choose straightforward wording when you are unsure of an idiom.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5
You use a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, including clauses introduced by “because,” “as a result,” and “when,” so there is some structural variety. The main argument remains understandable, but some grammatical errors affect clarity. For example, “the cost of food when eating out is much higher as preparing meal at home” has an incomplete comparison structure, and “people usually order a large amount … but at the ended up” contains a faulty clause construction. There are also issues with articles and number, as in “has become source” and “preparing meal.” Work on complete comparisons (“higher than the cost of preparing a meal at home”), article use, and checking that each clause has a clear subject and verb. More accurate control of these patterns would make the complex sentences easier to follow.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.