Band 7.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 7.0 · IELTS Predictions Nov 2026 · 2026-11-12

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Advances in communication technology have made it easier for people to stay in touch, but they have also weakened the quality of personal relationships.

To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 7.0)

Nowadays, people can instantly keep in touch with their friends and family thanks to advanced communication tools. However some people argue that this trend has worsened genuine personal relationships. I strongly agree that new technology applications help people who live far away connect instantly, but at the same time, it chips away at genuine face-to-face interactions with people around you.

On one hand, due to the growing development of technology, people can stay in touch with their long-distance friends and family. They can connect with them with a click and keep their relationship strong. When this happens, people are less worried and feel less lonely, especially when families live in different parts of the world. For example, an international student can rely on his family when he feels lonely and when he needs someone to listen to him during difficult times. Messaging apps like Messenger and Skype can make this happen seamlessly.

On the other hand, if you do not use it responsibly, it can weaken the quality of personal relationships with the people who surround you. While you have thousands of friends online, the true intimacy of face-to-face relationships is going to be pretty rare. For example, friends spending time at a cafe glued to their screens or talking with their virtual friends can definitely have a detrimental effect on physical relationships. When people do not value the immediate friendship, they are going to lose the relationship. Therefore in my opinion, it is important to strike a balance between virtual and physical relationships.

In conclusion, strongly agree that society can easily keep in touch with anyone from anywhere and at the same time, this trend can have a negative impact on their physical relationships. Therefore, a healthy approach is to balance them both to have a positive relationships.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 7.0

Your position is clear throughout: you agree that communication technology can both maintain distant relationships and weaken in-person ones. The response addresses both sides of the statement, and the examples of an international student seeking family support and friends using phones in a café help explain your reasoning. This fits a response that covers the task and supports its main ideas. To develop the argument further, explain more precisely how online contact can preserve closeness while reducing attention or depth in face-to-face relationships. Some claims, such as “thousands of friends online” and the prediction that intimacy will be “pretty rare,” are broad; qualifying them or adding a specific explanation would make the support more convincing.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 7.0

The essay has a clear, effective structure: an introduction states your position, two body paragraphs present contrasting effects, and the conclusion returns to your recommendation to balance virtual and physical relationships. Signposting such as “On one hand,” “On the other hand,” and “In conclusion” makes the progression easy to follow, while examples are placed in the relevant paragraphs. This is a logical and coherent arrangement. Some linking is a little formulaic, and the conclusion repeats the introduction’s point rather than drawing the two arguments together in a more developed way. You could also make references more precise—for example, clarify what “When this happens” refers to—and use a wider range of transitions to connect cause, example, and consequence.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.5

You use an adequate range of topic vocabulary, including “long-distance,” “genuine,” “intimacy,” “detrimental effect,” and “strike a balance.” These choices communicate the central ideas clearly, and some less common expressions show an effort to be precise. However, several phrases are awkward or imprecise, such as “growing development of technology,” “physical relationships,” and “positive relationships.” “Pretty rare” is also informal for an academic essay, while “connect with them with a click” is repetitive. Greater control of collocation and register would make the vocabulary more natural and flexible. Choose expressions that distinguish in-person interaction from physical relationships, and avoid repeating broad terms such as “relationship” when a more exact noun is available.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 6.5

You use a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, including conditional clauses (“if you do not use it responsibly”) and subordinate clauses explaining effects. Most sentences are understandable, and punctuation generally supports the meaning. Some grammatical errors remain, which is consistent with this level of control. For example, the opening of the conclusion lacks a subject (“In conclusion, strongly agree”), and “a positive relationships” has an article–plural mismatch. The sentence “While you have thousands of friends online, the true intimacy … is going to be pretty rare” also has an unclear relationship between its clauses. Review sentence completeness, agreement, and clause connections, then proofread for small errors. More consistently accurate complex sentences would strengthen the range already present.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.