Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · IELTS Predictions Nov 2026 · 2026-11-12

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Advances in communication technology have made it easier for people to stay in touch, but they have also weakened the quality of personal relationships.

To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

Unlike in the past, communication technologies were not developed in a broader way due to limited opportunities. However, today, time has changed and major number of people have digital devices, which enable them to communicate with their loved once. Hence, in person meeting with relatives trend was dropped. Considering this view, I strongly agree that beauty of personal relationships will affect.

In earlier days when the technology advancement is not prominent, all people were plan get-togethe. This view exists as, people were often plan to meet physically with their family, friends and neighbour. For example, people were often planed to meet at garden and play games, playes cards at tarrace and doing road trips. As a result, they will being connected with eachother and build a good relationships.

However, in current scenario communication technology development is at peak and mostly all people have access to use it. Furthermore, everyone has digital devices such as mobile phone, ipad, laptops and computers their involment in these technology is rising and they will access communication at any time. Main advantage is people are able to meet virtually using smart devices. Nonetheless, people are forgeting the value of spending time with their close ones. Therefore, physical quality time with family member was weakened.

In summary, I believe that communication technology is important but beling rely on them is not appropriate that's why people should give less importance to use digital device and try to do physucal comminication by meeting in-person which help to build good relationships between them.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

Your position is clear: you strongly agree that communication technology can weaken personal relationships, and you address both the earlier pattern of meeting in person and the current reliance on devices. The examples of playing games, cards, and taking trips help illustrate how shared activities can build connections. However, some points are asserted rather than fully explained. For instance, you say that people “forget the value” of time with close ones, but do not show how virtual contact changes the depth or quality of those relationships. The opening also suggests that in-person meetings have declined without supporting this claim. Develop the cause-and-effect reasoning and consider acknowledging that technology can also help people maintain relationships across distance.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a recognisable overall structure: an introduction, two body paragraphs contrasting past and present, and a conclusion that restates your view. This makes the main line of argument easy to follow. You also use transitions such as “However,” “Furthermore,” and “Therefore” to signal relationships between ideas. At times, though, the links are mechanical or unclear. For example, “Hence, in person meeting with relatives trend was dropped” does not clearly connect the preceding point to the claim, and “This view exists as” is an awkward lead-in to the example. Some references, such as “them” in the conclusion, could be more precise. Use clearer topic sentences and connect each example explicitly to its effect on relationship quality.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use relevant vocabulary for the topic, including “communication technology,” “digital devices,” “virtually,” and “quality time,” and you attempt some less common expressions such as “prominent” and “involvement.” However, word choice and collocation are often inaccurate, which sometimes makes the meaning difficult to interpret. Examples include “major number of people,” “loved once,” “beauty of personal relationships will affect,” and “physical quality time … was weakened.” Spelling errors such as “forgeting,” “physucal,” and “comminication” also reduce accuracy. Build a more reliable set of topic phrases and check spelling and word forms carefully. Prefer natural combinations such as “a large number of people,” “loved ones,” and “the quality of relationships may decline.”

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and more complex sentence forms, including clauses introduced by “when,” “which,” and “that,” and the overall meaning is usually recoverable. However, there are some recurring problems with verb forms, agreement, articles, and sentence construction. For example, “all people were plan get-togethe” needs a correctly formed past-tense verb, while “they will being connected” combines incompatible verb forms. In “people were often plan to meet,” the verb pattern is also incorrect. The sentence beginning “everyone has digital devices” runs several ideas together without clear grammatical links. Practise forming past-tense statements and checking subject–verb agreement, then use punctuation to separate complete ideas. More accurate control of these patterns would make your argument clearer.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.