Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · IELTS Predictions Nov 2026 · 2026-11-14

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

In some cities, people are knocking down historic buildings to make room for more homes.

To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

In many cities,old buildings are being demolised in order to build new houses.While housing is a real problem, I strongly disagree with this approach. Government or the authorities should have another solution for this. This is against our cultural norms. These buildings are valuebale part of a city's identity.

First af all,historic buildings give a city its character and history. They tell about the story of people who lived there before us. For example, in peshawar places like qissa khawani bazar and old forts make local people feel proud of their city. Places like Iqbal fort in lahore have a great sentimental values among people.If we destroy these buildings,we will lose the history forever. New houses cannot replace it.

Secondly, knocking down old buildings is not the only solution. and also not a only way to solve the housing problem. These historic places attracts tourists,that is a huge finincial support to the economy. People around the world visit these places and learn about our culture. A city with history is more attractive for tourism and business,which brings money and job employment. For new houses, we can use the spare lands.

Out of many people, few of them argue that old buidlings are expensive to maintain. This is true to some extent. However,the long term benefit keeping them is greater. By this act new generation will forget their cultural values.

In conclusion,we should protect our hertiage and find other places to build houses. Destroying historic buildings is not the right solution.We should protect our heritage and find other places to build houses.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5

Your position is clear from the introduction: you strongly disagree with demolishing historic buildings, and the conclusion reinforces this view. You address both the value of heritage and the need to find other ways to provide housing. The examples of Qissa Khawani Bazaar and the forts make the cultural argument relevant, while tourism offers a second reason. This meets the task well, and the response shows some development beyond simply stating an opinion. However, the alternative of using “spare lands” is asserted rather than explained, and the point about maintenance receives only brief acknowledgement. To strengthen the response further, explain how alternative housing could be provided and develop the counterargument before showing why preservation should take priority.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a recognisable structure: an introduction, two supporting paragraphs, a brief counterargument and a conclusion. Sequencing phrases such as “First of all,” “Secondly” and “In conclusion” help readers follow the main stages. However, some links are mechanical or awkward, particularly “Secondly, knocking down old buildings is not the only solution. and also not a only way,” where the second fragment interrupts the progression. References such as “By this act” are not fully clear, and the conclusion repeats the recommendation to protect heritage and find other building sites. Use cohesive devices more naturally, connect related points within complete paragraphs, and avoid repeating the same conclusion so that progression feels smoother.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use relevant topic vocabulary, including “historic buildings,” “city’s identity,” “sentimental values,” “tourists” and “economy,” which helps communicate your main ideas. There are also attempts at more specific expressions, such as “cultural norms” and “long term benefit.” However, spelling and word-choice errors are noticeable: “demolised,” “valuebale,” “finincial,” “buidlings” and “hertiage” appear, and some combinations are unnatural, such as “job employment” and “a huge finincial support.” These do not prevent understanding, but they reduce precision and control. Check spelling carefully and learn common collocations for heritage, tourism and housing; this will make your vocabulary more accurate and natural.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt both simple statements and longer sentences, for example, “While housing is a real problem, I strongly disagree with this approach” and “If we destroy these buildings, we will lose the history forever.” These structures communicate your position and reasoning clearly. However, some sentence boundaries and grammatical patterns need more control. “Secondly, knocking down old buildings is not the only solution. and also not a only way” contains an incomplete follow-on sentence, while “These historic places attracts tourists” has a subject–verb agreement error. There are also issues with articles and plurals in “a great sentimental values,” and punctuation is inconsistent around sentence openings and commas. Practise combining related clauses into complete sentences and checking agreement, articles and punctuation during revision.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.