Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · IELTS Predictions Nov 2026 · 2026-11-14

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Choosing a career early and remaining in it is more beneficial than changing jobs frequently, as it generally leads to greater satisfaction at work and greater security. People who change jobs, however, may gain other advantages.

To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

It is often argued that selecting a career on preliminary stage and being stable in it has more advantages rather than switching jobs frequently, because consistency for long time at a same firm gives greater job satisfaction and security. While it is true that individuals who change jobs alternately may gain different advantages. However, I firmly agree with the view that remain stable with one job is appropriate decision rather than switching for other jobs due to several compelling reasons.

To commence with, one of the most significant reasons is that working with the same organization for a long period of time gives more opportunities and values. This view exists as, after certain years of service in one firm employee promoted as H.O.D (Head of the department), few gets more perks such as personal car, personal loan in lower interest and more holidays, while some people also get awarded by their loyalty or by long term service awards. This clearly demonstrates that workers or employees getting more advantages in different aspects as being loyal for same organization.

Moreover, another crucial factor to consider that individuals feel more confident in problem solving and it leads to greater satisfaction for working for same company over a major period of time. To elaborate this, I can say that doing different work for long period make people experts, For instance, an electrical design engineer has work for 15 years in same organization with design team so they able to solve any problem related to that particular task as they have mastered the process. However, I believe that the person who change their job frequently for better perks or some other advantage they will never become an expert in any particular task. Therefore, stable job gives greater satisfaction and builds good relationship with co-workers.

In summary, although some may argue that individuals who change jobs may gain other advantage. I strongly believe that being loyal for same firm or organization for long terms gives you better experience, job satisfaction and opportunities to take leads.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

Your position is clear: you agree that staying in one career is preferable, and you give relevant reasons involving promotion, benefits, expertise and workplace relationships. The examples of long-service rewards and the electrical design engineer help explain your view. You also acknowledge that people who change jobs may gain advantages, so the task is addressed. However, that opposing view is only mentioned, not explained with a specific benefit or example, and some claims—such as frequent movers never becoming experts—are too absolute. Develop both sides more evenly and explain how each reason leads to greater satisfaction or security to make the argument more fully supported.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The response has a clear overall structure: an introduction, two supporting paragraphs and a conclusion. Ideas generally progress from workplace rewards to expertise and satisfaction, and signposts such as “Moreover,” “For instance” and “In summary” help the reader follow the argument. This meets the lower-band expectation of coherent organisation and shows some of the flexibility associated with stronger cohesion. However, transitions can feel mechanical, particularly “To commence with” and “Moreover,” and the concession in the introduction (“While it is true… However”) is not developed later. Some references are also unclear, such as “they” in the engineer example. Use more precise links between claims and examples, and ensure each paragraph develops one connected line of reasoning.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.0

You use an adequate range of topic vocabulary, including “job satisfaction,” “security,” “promoted,” “perks,” “loyalty” and “problem solving.” These choices make the main ideas clear, and attempts at more specific language, such as “long term service awards,” are relevant. Some word choices and collocations are inaccurate or unnatural, however: “on preliminary stage,” “being stable in it,” “change jobs alternately” and “take leads” do not express the intended meanings naturally. There is also repetition of “same organization” and “advantages.” Aim for more precise career-related phrasing and check common word partnerships; this would make the argument sound more fluent and controlled without changing its meaning.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt both simple and complex sentence forms, including a concession (“While it is true…”) and a reason clause (“because consistency… gives…”). The overall meaning is usually understandable, but some grammatical errors remain across the response. For example, “I firmly agree with the view that remain stable” needs a subject and an appropriate verb form, while “after certain years of service in one firm employee promoted” is missing grammatical elements. In the engineer example, “has work” and “they able to solve” also show problems with verb forms and sentence construction. Review subject–verb agreement, articles and complete clause structure, then proofread longer sentences to ensure each clause has a clear subject and finite verb.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.