Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · IELTS Predictions Nov 2026 · 2026-11-14

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people believe that children who commit crimes should be punished. Others argue that their parents should be punished. The question of who is responsible can be difficult.

Discuss both views and provide your opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.0)

In this modern era, crimes have been increasing day by day. Youngsters should be punished if they invovle in crime has thought of many masses while some think that guidern should be punished . However, this is debatable issue that who could be resposible for this. In this essay I will discuss both the prespective and also give concusion in the forthcoming paragraphs.

There are myriad reasons why individuals think that children ought to be punished . The first and foremost is fear of commiting crime. To be more precise, if adults get punishment, they think twice times to commit any kind of crime in their life. To cite an example, if a child do a pick pocket, send once to the centre for a while so they have fear to not do it again in life . Thus, helping a good citizen in future

On the other hand, some opine that parents should be punished if youngsters commit crime . As people know children learn everything from their parents, they also learn how to do behave in the society if there parents teach them properly they should not do any offense in their life

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 4.0

You introduce the issue and present both views: children may be punished to deter further crime, while parents may be held responsible for how they raise their children. However, the response addresses the task only partially. The first view receives a brief explanation and an example, but the parents’ view is left as a general claim, with no developed example or explanation of what punishment for parents might involve. Most importantly, you do not clearly state your own opinion, despite promising a conclusion, and the response ends without one. The response also falls 55 words short of the required minimum, which limits the space available to develop the discussion. Explain both positions more fully and give a direct, supported judgement about who should be responsible.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

The response has a basic paragraph structure: an introduction, a paragraph supporting punishment for children, and a paragraph presenting the parents’ view. Signposting such as “On the other hand” helps readers recognise the change in viewpoint, and “To cite an example” signals an illustration. However, progression is incomplete: the final paragraph stops abruptly, and there is no concluding paragraph to bring the discussion together or state your position. Some links are mechanical or unclear, particularly “Thus, helping a good citizen in future,” which is not a complete sentence and does not clearly connect to the preceding example. Develop each paragraph around a clear main point, use linking expressions to show the relationship between ideas, and finish with a conclusion.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use some topic-relevant vocabulary, including “punished,” “commit crime,” “fear,” and “society,” and attempts such as “myriad reasons” show an effort to use less common language. However, the range is limited and several inaccurate word choices or spellings make the message less clear. For example, “guidern” does not communicate the intended word, while “prespective” and “concusion” are misspelled. Phrases such as “fear of committing crime” and “think twice times” are also unnatural or imprecise. Aim for accurate, natural collocations rather than inserting formal-sounding words, and check spelling carefully. More precise terms such as “deter,” “parental responsibility,” and “juvenile offending” would help you express the arguments clearly.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and more complex sentence forms, including a conditional idea in “if adults get punishment, they think twice times to commit…” and a subordinate clause beginning “As people know…”. However, complex structures are often faulty, and errors occur frequently enough to make some sentences difficult to follow. Examples include “Youngsters should be punished if they invovle in crime has thought,” where the clause structure is incomplete, and “if a child do a pick pocket, send once to the centre,” which lacks a correctly formed main clause and has incorrect subject–verb agreement. The final paragraph also contains a run-on sentence joining several ideas without clear punctuation. Practise complete sentence patterns, verb forms and agreement, and separate connected ideas with appropriate punctuation.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.