Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 16 · 2026-08-19
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
Many manufactured food and drink products contain high levels of sugar, which causes many health problems. Sugary products should be made more expensive to encourage people to consume less sugar.
Do you agree or disagree?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 5.0)
It is often argued that several processed food and beverages include more than enough glucose, which trigger various types of illness. Some people believe that sweet products should be made more costly to inspire people to ingest lesser sugar. I completely agree with this view because this types of goods does not give any benefits. Although it injurious to health.
The primary reason why I support this vies is that, it creates many medical problems for humans such as diabities and increase blood pressure in human body. This is because some of the drink product companies add high intake sugar for making a flavourable or tasty sodas and these companies do not follow any rules while making drinkables and it leads to disease . For example in Canada the company called coco-cola was very popular at that time and most of the people used to drink that soda. As a result many people sufferd
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 4.0 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 5.0 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.0 |
| Overall | 5.0 |
Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 4.0
The response fails to meet the minimum word count requirement of 250 words, reaching only 154 words. Consequently, the development of ideas is severely limited. While you state your position clearly in the introduction, the supporting arguments are underdeveloped and lack sufficient depth. The example provided regarding a specific company is incomplete and does not effectively illustrate the argument regarding taxation. To improve, you must expand your points with more detailed explanations and provide a full, coherent conclusion to ensure all parts of the task are addressed thoroughly.
Coherence and Cohesion — Band 5.0
The essay shows some attempt at logical organization, with an introduction and a body paragraph. However, the progression is interrupted by the abrupt ending of the text. Cohesive devices are used, such as 'Although' and 'For example', but they are sometimes used incorrectly or in a way that does not link ideas smoothly. Paragraphing is present, but the lack of a concluding paragraph and the incomplete nature of the second paragraph hinder the overall flow and structure of the argument.
Lexical Resource — Band 5.0
The vocabulary used is generally adequate for basic communication but lacks the range and precision expected for higher bands. There are several instances of awkward word choices, such as 'drinkables' instead of 'beverages' and 'glucose' when referring to general sugar content. Spelling errors, such as 'diabities' and 'sufferd', also detract from the quality of the writing. To improve, focus on using more precise academic terminology and ensure accurate spelling of key terms related to health and nutrition.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.0
The essay contains a mix of simple and some attempted complex structures, but there are frequent grammatical errors that occasionally impede clarity. Examples include subject-verb agreement issues like 'this types of goods does not' and 'some of the drink product companies add high intake sugar'. Punctuation is also inconsistent, particularly with comma usage. The sentence structure is often repetitive, and the grammatical inaccuracies are frequent enough to cause some difficulty for the reader. Focusing on basic sentence construction and subject-verb agreement will help improve your score.
See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.