Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 16 · 2026-09-14
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
Many manufactured food and drink products contain high levels of sugar, which causes many health problems. Sugary products should be made more expensive to encourage people to consume less sugar.
Do you agree or disagree?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 5.0)
In today's time, various king of eatable products having sugar are launching every day which leads to different serious medical problem after consuming. I am fully agreed that items containing high amount of sugar ought to be more costly to encourage individuals to intake minimum sugar and it will be more described in upcoming paragraphs.
At the outset, there are numerous factor to make sugar based item more expensive and the first and foremost is hard to purchase. To explain it more, children are main consumer of these kind of products and after increasing the price they will face difficulty to purchase which will stop them to buy. For example, if cold drinks will cost more than healthy juice then young ones will prefer juice.
Furthermore, expensive sugary foods will decrease the demand of it in market,
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 4.0 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 5.0 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.0 |
| Overall | 5.0 |
Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 4.0
The response clearly presents a position on whether sugary products should be made more expensive, noting that you are 'fully agreed'. However, the essay is severely under-length, containing only 137 words compared to the minimum requirement of 250 words. This incomplete development prevents the ideas from being fully explored. Although the writer attempts to provide reasons such as affordability and impact on children, the abrupt cutoff in the second body paragraph means the task is only partially addressed. Consequently, a lower band score is warranted due to the significant under-length penalty applied in accordance with official guidelines.
Coherence and Cohesion — Band 5.0
The essay attempts an introduction and body paragraphs with some organizational structure, using phrases like 'At the outset' and 'Furthermore'. However, the coherence is severely disrupted by the incomplete text that cuts off mid-sentence. Paragraphing is initiated but not maintained effectively due to the lack of a concluding section. Referencing and cohesive devices are basic and sometimes faulty, such as 'these kind of products' and the dangling transition at the end. Overall progression is hindered by the premature ending.
Lexical Resource — Band 5.0
The vocabulary used is generally basic and repetitive, with noticeable errors in word choice and collocation. Examples include 'various king of eatable products', 'medical problem', and 'sugar based item'. The writer attempts some less common vocabulary, such as 'consumer', 'expensive', and 'demand', but struggles with accurate phrasing and pluralization ('various king', 'numerous factor'). These errors do not entirely impede communication, but the limited and repetitive range restricts the lexical score significantly.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.0
The essay displays a mix of simple and complex sentence structures, but many attempts at complex structures contain noticeable grammatical errors. Examples include 'products having sugar are launching' and 'after increasing the price they will face difficulty to purchase which will stop them to buy'. Punctuation and agreement errors are also present, such as 'items containing high amount' (missing article) and 'cold drinks will cost' (tense usage). While some sentences are understandable, frequent errors and awkward phrasing lower the overall accuracy of the writing.
See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.