Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 16 · 2026-10-29

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Many manufactured food and drink products contain high levels of sugar, which causes many health problems. Sugary products should be made more expensive to encourage people to consume less sugar.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

There is a growing concern regarding sugary products . Where Food and drinks contains high level of sugar , due to that many peoples are facing health issues . Some people suggest to increase the price of sugar , where it encourage people to consume less than before . I disagree with the notion to increase the price of sugar .

On the one hand, Sugar plays an important role in the society, where people choose the sugar as a main commodity on daily basis . Moreover, it is widely argued that there many companies add chemical to the sugar and other beverages . Where, it can cause several health issues to the people who consume it . For instance, in the market there are numerous types of sugar products with different brand name . People often choose sugary products which is low in price . However, that particular kind of products will be having more preservatives and chemical which address to health problems .

On the other hand, there are other many companies where they manufacture sugary products in an organic way . Simultaneously, people can prefer organic beverages without rising the price of the product . Such as, several companies take effective measures and produce products using natural ingrediants .

In conclusion, there are multiple options to choose meanwhile, people should focus on their health and simultaneously fullfil their daily needs . For that, Increasing in the price of products is not an proper solution. Instead, rectify the problem and choose the alternative source for similiar product.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.0

You state a clear disagreement in the introduction and return to it in the conclusion, so your position is identifiable. However, the response only partially addresses the central proposal: it discusses sugar as a commodity, preservatives, and organic alternatives, but does not explain directly whether making sugary products more expensive would reduce consumption or why that policy is preferable or harmful. The claim that low-priced products contain more chemicals is not clearly supported, and the organic-products point is not developed with a specific example or explanation. To strengthen the response, build two relevant reasons for your position and connect each one explicitly to the effect of price increases on consumers and health.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

The response has a recognisable introduction, two body paragraphs presenting contrasting points, and a conclusion. This gives it some overall organisation. However, progression within paragraphs is often unclear: the first body paragraph moves from sugar’s importance to chemicals and then to low-priced products without showing how these points support your disagreement with higher prices. Linking expressions such as “On the one hand,” “Moreover,” and “On the other hand” are used, but several connections are mechanical or inaccurate; repeated “where” does not clearly express the relationship between ideas. Improve cohesion by arranging each paragraph around one main reason, then use clear references and cause-and-effect links to explain it.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use some topic-related vocabulary, including “health issues,” “preservatives,” “organic,” and “natural ingredients,” and the reader can generally understand your intended meaning. However, the range is limited and several word choices or collocations are inaccurate, which sometimes makes ideas difficult to follow. For example, “increase the price of sugar” does not consistently refer to the task’s proposal to raise prices of sugary products, while “address to health problems” and “fullfil their daily needs” are unclear or unnatural. Spelling errors such as “ingred iants” (written as “ingred iants” in the response), “similiar,” and “fullfil” also reduce accuracy. Aim for precise task vocabulary and check spelling and collocations.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and longer sentence forms, but complex constructions are often faulty, and frequent errors affect clarity. Examples include “Food and drinks contains,” where the subject and verb do not agree, and “there many companies add chemical,” which is missing a grammatical structure. Articles, plurals, and sentence boundaries also need attention, as in “not an proper solution” and the inconsistent capitalisation after full stops. Some sentences are understandable, but the repeated use of “where” to join clauses often creates incomplete or awkward structures. Practise building accurate subject–verb sentences first, then add subordinate clauses with appropriate connectors such as “because,” “which,” and “although.”

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.