Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 16 · 2026-10-29

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Many manufactured food and drink products contain high levels of sugar, which causes many health problems. Sugary products should be made more expensive to encourage people to consume less sugar.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

A substantial number of health problems are associated with the high level of sugar in manufactured food and drink products, and by raising the price of these products, we can keep people away from consuming them. But it's not a longterm solution for this problem, and I personally don't agree with this solution, there are many proven ways for solving these kinds of problem, that really work well in long run.

When something starts getting expensive, people get in search of some alternatives that are as good as they want with the cheap price. Same principal works here, if we make the sugary products expensive, people will start finding something cheap and in that way the people will consume less sugar. For example, when the petrol prices increased, people started moving towards electric vehicles, that was both good for them and also for environment.

But it doesn't always works, when you raise the price of a product, it becomes a sign of royalty, people just want to consume that to prove themselves that they can afford expensive things, after that it becomes a competition and gradually becomes a trend. Instead of this, educating the people regarding disadvantages of these sugary products can be more helpful in longterms. The students should get enough information regarding these issues in there respective educational institutes, government should run multiple physical compaigns, and also consider running ads on social media for awareness, just like many governments run ads regarding health issues due to smooking.

In conclusion, I would say making products expensive to avoid people from using it, can work in short term, but long term solutions need a good planning and a proper execution of that, that includes spreading awareness about that through proper channels.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5

Your position is clear: you disagree that making sugary products more expensive is the right solution, while acknowledging that higher prices may reduce consumption in the short term. The petrol-price example supports the idea that consumers may switch to alternatives, and you also offer education and public-awareness campaigns as longer-term measures. This addresses the question and gives relevant reasons. However, the comparison with electric vehicles is not fully explained in relation to sugar, and the claim that expensive products can become a status symbol is asserted rather than supported. To strengthen the response, develop these points with a more direct example and explain how each proposed measure would change people’s choices. The main ideas are relevant, but their support is uneven.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The response has a clear overall structure: an introduction states your view, the body paragraphs consider price increases and alternatives, and the conclusion restates your position. The progression from a possible short-term effect to longer-term education is easy to follow. You also use linking expressions such as “For example,” “But,” and “In conclusion.” At times, however, connections feel mechanical or the references are unclear. For instance, “that was both good for them” does not specify what benefit is meant, and the final sentence repeats the contrast between short- and long-term solutions without adding much. Use more precise referencing and make each paragraph’s central point explicit before developing it.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use some relevant topic vocabulary, including “manufactured food and drink products,” “alternatives,” “educating,” and “awareness,” and your meaning is generally understandable. There are also attempts at less common expressions, such as “a sign of royalty,” but this is not the intended phrase; “a status symbol” would be more natural. Several word-choice and spelling problems reduce precision, including “principal” for “principle,” “longterms,” “compaigns,” and “smooking.” Phrases such as “keep people away from consuming them” and “cheap price” are also awkward. Build a more accurate range of collocations for discussing consumption, public health, and policy, and check spelling and word forms carefully.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt a mix of simple and complex sentences, using clauses with “when,” “if,” and “that,” and the overall meaning can usually be followed. However, some errors in verb forms, agreement, sentence boundaries, and punctuation remain. For example, “it doesn't always works” should be “it doesn’t always work,” while “there are many proven ways … that really work well” has an unclear reference. The opening sentence joins several complete ideas with commas, creating a run-on, and the final sentence also needs clearer punctuation and structure. Practise separating independent clauses and checking subject–verb agreement and verb forms. More consistently controlled complex sentences would make your argument easier to read.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.