Band 8.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 8.0 · Barron's Writing · 2026-08-05

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people say that the best way to discourage smoking is to make smoking illegal in public places. Other people say that this is not enough and that other measures are needed.

Discuss both these views, and give your opinion.

Give reasons for your answer, and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 8.0)

Here's a Band 7.5–8 style IELTS Task 2 essay:

Smoking remains a major public health issue in many countries. While some people argue that banning smoking in public places is the most effective way to reduce tobacco use, others believe that such restrictions alone cannot solve the problem and that additional measures are necessary. This essay will discuss both viewpoints before explaining why I support the latter opinion.

On the one hand, making smoking illegal in public places can significantly discourage people from smoking. Public smoking bans reduce smokers' opportunities to smoke throughout the day, making the habit less convenient. In addition, these laws protect non-smokers from the harmful effects of second-hand smoke and help create a healthier environment in workplaces, restaurants, and public transport. Furthermore, when smoking becomes less visible in society, young people may be less likely to view it as normal or attractive, which could reduce the number of new smokers.

On the other hand, public smoking bans alone are unlikely to eliminate smoking because they do not address the underlying causes of nicotine addiction. Many smokers simply continue the habit in private spaces, such as their homes, without reducing their overall cigarette consumption. Therefore, governments should introduce additional policies, including higher taxes on tobacco products, stricter regulations on tobacco advertising, and free smoking cessation programmes. Public education campaigns that explain the long-term health risks of smoking can also encourage people to quit. For example, several countries have successfully reduced smoking rates by combining public smoking bans with graphic warning labels on cigarette packages and accessible support services for smokers.

In my opinion, a comprehensive approach is far more effective than relying solely on public smoking bans. Although restrictions in public places play an important role in protecting public health, they work best when combined with education, financial disincentives, and professional support for those trying to overcome addiction.

In conclusion, banning smoking in public places is an important step towards reducing tobacco use, but it is not sufficient on its own. A combination of legal restrictions, education, taxation, and cessation support offers the greatest chance of lowering smoking rates and improving public health.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 8.0

The response fully addresses all parts of the task. You have clearly discussed both viewpoints—the efficacy of public smoking bans and the necessity of a multi-faceted approach—and provided a clear, consistent personal opinion throughout the essay. The ideas are well-developed, with logical arguments provided for each perspective. For instance, you effectively explain why bans alone are insufficient by noting that they do not address the root cause of addiction. The conclusion synthesises your points well, ensuring the response is balanced and comprehensive. The development of ideas is consistent with the requirements for a high band score.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 8.0

The essay demonstrates a clear logical progression throughout. Each paragraph has a central topic, and the transition between paragraphs is smooth, using effective linking phrases such as 'On the one hand', 'On the other hand', and 'In conclusion'. Cohesive devices are used flexibly and naturally, such as 'Furthermore', 'Therefore', and 'Although'. The paragraphing is logical and contributes to the overall clarity of the argument. There is no evidence of mechanical or repetitive use of cohesive devices, and the referencing is precise, making the flow of ideas easy to follow for the reader.

Lexical Resource — Band 8.0

You demonstrate a wide and flexible range of vocabulary that is appropriate for an academic essay. You use less common lexical items with precision, such as 'cessation programmes', 'financial disincentives', and 'underlying causes'. The collocations are natural, and there are no noticeable errors in word choice or spelling. The vocabulary is sophisticated enough to convey your arguments clearly and effectively. You have maintained a formal, academic tone throughout the response, which is well-suited to the task requirements.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 8.0

The essay displays a wide range of grammatical structures, including complex sentences with subordinate clauses (e.g., 'While some people argue that...', 'Although restrictions in public places play...'). The majority of your sentences are error-free, and your control over punctuation is excellent. There are no significant grammatical errors that impede communication. The use of modal verbs and conditional structures is accurate and adds nuance to your arguments. The grammatical control is consistent and reflects a high level of proficiency.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.