Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Barron's Writing · 2026-10-02

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people say that the best way to discourage smoking is to make smoking illegal in public places. Other people say that this is not enough and that other measures are needed.

Discuss both these views, and give your opinion.

Give reasons for your answer, and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

Nowadays, everyone is overwhelmed with a lot of commitments .Therefore, it is an argued issue whether constuctive way to mitigate smoking is to impose not legal in public areas rather than trying multifarious ramifications to cope with that . I completely accod with the former notion since public areas given freedom to youngsters and also insipre other to invlove in smoking .

commencing with the most silent reason why smoing should be imposed in public parks and building . when individuals are restricted at homes , they always try to find park or public transit area near by them for smoke and drugs . Consequently , these places work as a freedom for them . By implements smoke ban in these areas, authorties can help to mitigate this problem . Not only pubic place give freedom go youngsters but it also attract other pople as well for smoking too . For instance , Last week i visied renowed beach near my city . While exploring ghd placd , i saw one person inhale ciggrate there and one of homeless ask him for ciggerate as well . It also effect socity on negative way .

However , some group of people thought that there are numerous ways to make society free from smoke . The prominent way to tackle this is providing educational lectures on internet by discribing the adverse health aliments of smoking . As we can see everyone thesedays connected to sophisticated technology . Another worth considing step can be government provide short term courses obligatery in schools and colleges to aware mentors and youngster about negative effects that people in society can face due to smoking habbit of one person . For example , there are chances might older people and small childen get infaction if other society person smoke and making rubbish and smell around his neck and corner .

In campandium , I totally maintain that public places should be free of smoke . This is primarily due to it work as a freedom and role model for smoke for other people . As a result , enbracing this perspective would nit only benefit individuals but also contribute to the long term development and overall well being of society .

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

The response addresses all parts of the task by discussing both views on how to discourage smoking and clearly presenting a personal opinion in favour of banning smoking in public places. However, the development of ideas remains somewhat limited and under-developed. For instance, the argument about public areas giving freedom to youngsters is introduced but supported only by a weak, anecdotal example about visiting a beach and observing a homeless person asking for a cigarette. While a clear position is maintained throughout the essay, the supporting arguments lack sufficient extension and depth, preventing the response from reaching a higher level of task fulfillment.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The essay displays a coherent overall arrangement with a clear attempt to structure the response into introduction, body paragraphs, and a conclusion. Paragraphing is used sufficiently to separate the differing views and the writer's stance. However, cohesion is at times faulty or mechanical. Words and phrases used to guide the reader, such as 'commencing with the most silent reason' and 'In campandium', are awkward or inaccurate. Referencing is also occasionally unclear, and the logical progression between sentences within paragraphs stumbles due to abrupt transitions, which keeps the organizational flow at a moderate level.

Lexical Resource: Band 4.5

The vocabulary used is limited and barely adequate for the task, featuring a restricted range of words and persistent errors. The student attempts to use less common items, such as 'multifarious ramifications', 'acaccord', and 'aliments', but these are frequently misused in terms of collocation and word choice. There are also notable spelling and word form mistakes throughout the text, including 'constuctive', 'ciggerate', 'infaction', and 'enbracing'. These lexical inaccuracies and spelling errors create noticeable strain for the reader and impede smooth communication, reflecting the boundaries of a limited lexical range.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

The writing demonstrates a very limited range of structures, relying mostly on simple sentence forms while attempts at complex sentences are frequently faulty. There are frequent errors in grammar and punctuation throughout the text that cause difficulty for the reader. Issues include problems with verb forms and tenses, missing or incorrect articles, prepositions inside grammatical patterns, and subject-verb agreement, such as 'government provide short term courses obligatery' and 'there are chances might older people and small childen get infaction'. These persistent errors restrict the grammatical repertoire and mean that error-free sentences are the exception rather than the rule.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.