Band 4.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 4.5 · Barron's Writing · 2026-11-09

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

People should never eat meat because raising animals for human consumption is cruel.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?

Give reasons for your answer, and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 4.5)

Some people think that they should never eat meat because they think that eating someone's meat is a curel thing. They do not agree with raising animals for human consumption. But some individuals prefer to eat animal products because for better health. In my opinion, consuming animal products and raising animals for meat and egg production is a normal thing, but it depends on what others think.

Nowadays, people intake fish, meat products and poultry products as a main protein source. There are so many farmes and factories according to the animal products. We can buy fresh meat, eggs and fish from groceries and supermarkets. Not only that there are many varieties of food items made with animal products.

On the one hand, some people do not prefer to eat meat because of some spiritual and cultural reasons. And also some reasons like allergies and dislikes. They do not accept raising animals for human needs. They think that is a kindless thing. Some vegetarian ones always try to fulfil their protein intake by using plant base products.

On the other hand, some individuals prefer to consume meat and other products according to their favouration. They think the need protein and always try to fulfill their protein intake. They do not care about spiritual or cultural matters.

In conclusion, eating meat is dep

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 3.5

You introduce the issue and mention reasons people avoid meat, such as spiritual or cultural beliefs, allergies, and dislike, as well as the protein needs cited by meat-eaters. However, the response does not clearly answer how far you agree or disagree: “it depends on what others think” leaves your own position uncertain, and the conclusion is unfinished (“In conclusion, eating meat is dep…”). Much of the discussion describes food availability and dietary preferences rather than evaluating whether raising animals is cruel. The ideas are also brief and lack specific examples or explanation. The response is 28 words below the required minimum, which further limits the opportunity to develop your argument. State a definite position, address animal welfare directly, and support each main reason with an example.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 4.5

The response has a recognisable structure: an introduction, two contrasting body paragraphs signposted by “On the one hand” and “On the other hand,” and an attempted conclusion. This gives the reader a basic sense of organisation. However, progression is limited because the paragraphs list points without showing how they support an answer to the question. Some links are mechanical or unclear, such as “And also some reasons like allergies and dislikes,” which is not a complete sentence and does not connect smoothly to the preceding idea. The final paragraph is cut off, so the essay has no completed summary or closing position. Build each paragraph around one clear claim, explain it, and use linking phrases to show the relationship between ideas rather than simply adding points.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use enough topic-related vocabulary to communicate the general subject, including “protein source,” “animal products,” “spiritual or cultural reasons,” and “plant base products.” There is some repetition of basic terms such as “meat,” “products,” and “protein,” and several inaccurate or unnatural choices make parts of the response difficult to interpret. For example, “favouration” does not express the intended idea, while “kindless thing” is not a natural way to describe cruelty. Spelling errors such as “curel” and “farmes” also reduce accuracy. Aim for more precise vocabulary about the central issue, including animal welfare and farming practices, and check word forms and spelling. Replacing repeated general terms with accurate alternatives will make your argument clearer.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple sentences and some longer structures, including “because” clauses and the contrastive opening “On the other hand.” Most of the basic meaning can be followed, but errors in sentence construction and grammatical patterns are frequent. For instance, “because for better health” is not a complete or correctly formed explanation, and “They think the need protein” is missing a grammatical element. “Not only that there are many varieties…” also lacks the structure needed after “Not only.” The fragment “And also some reasons like allergies and dislikes” interrupts the flow, while the unfinished conclusion leaves the final sentence incomplete. Practise forming complete clauses, especially after linking expressions, and check that each sentence has a clear subject and verb.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.