Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Barron's Writing · 2026-11-11

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

People should never eat meat because raising animals for human consumption is cruel.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?

Give reasons for your answer, and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

An individual should not consume meat as comsuming animals for human food satisfaction considered to be brutal. I believe that although human body needs protein, eating meat should not be solely options available. Moreover I strongly agree that meat consumption should be banned.

To begin with, animals play an important role in order to balance the biodiversity. In this world, every creatures has different roles to one another to protect the life circles. Consequently, animals have a life circle that should not be violeted. In addition, many people choose to eat meat to have protein in their body which is cruel. In order to take protein, there multiple options out there including vegetables, beans, paneer and so on. Raising animals for human consumption in not only brutal but it also brings potential hazard to the biodiversity.

Furthermore, many vegeterians do not eat meat because they find it substantially brutal to the animals. It is needless to say that every creatures has a right to live such as, animals. The world can be more worth of living if the people understand the concept of protecting animals. The government should make some campaings regarding not to kill animals as it is just as important as human. Public awareness is needed to resolve this problen. If governemt could execute some laws, it might be little more helpful to protect the animal lives.

In conclusion, all living creatures are equally important as human. It should be obligated not to harm any animals, particularly for human consumtion. The government and public awareness can reduce this problem, even if not eradicated.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

Your position is clear: you strongly agree that meat consumption should be banned, and you give relevant reasons concerning animal rights and biodiversity. The examples of alternative protein sources, such as beans and paneer, also support your argument. However, the response only partly develops the task’s central claim about cruelty in raising animals for food. The biodiversity point is asserted rather than explained, and the discussion of vegetarianism largely repeats the view that harming animals is wrong. The proposed government campaigns and laws are relevant, but their role in answering whether people should never eat meat could be made clearer. Develop each main reason with a specific explanation or example, and address the absolute wording of “never” more directly.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a clear overall arrangement: an introduction, two body paragraphs, and a conclusion. Paragraphs generally have identifiable purposes, and signposts such as “To begin with,” “Furthermore,” and “In conclusion” help readers follow the sequence. However, some connections are mechanical or unclear. For example, “Consequently” does not clearly show how the preceding statement about biodiversity leads to the claim about life cycles, while the shift from protein alternatives to biodiversity hazards is abrupt. The second body paragraph also moves from animal rights to public campaigns and laws without fully linking these ideas. Use fewer formulaic transitions and make the relationship between each claim and its supporting explanation explicit; clearer referencing would also help the argument progress more smoothly.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use some relevant topic vocabulary, including “biodiversity,” “protein,” “vegetarians,” “public awareness,” and “eradicated,” and these choices help communicate the subject. There is also an attempt to use more formal language, as in “potential hazard” and “substantially brutal.” However, the range is limited and several word-choice, collocation, and spelling errors make the expression less natural, such as “human food satisfaction,” “life circles,” and “more worth of living.” Misspellings including “comsuming,” “violeted,” and “governemt” are noticeable. Aim for accurate, natural phrases rather than more elaborate wording: for example, describe animal welfare and the environmental effects of livestock farming directly. Proofreading spelling and checking collocations would make your ideas easier to understand.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and more complex sentence forms, including a concession in “although human body needs protein” and a conditional sentence beginning “If governemt could execute some laws.” This shows some range, but control is inconsistent, and errors occur often enough to make parts of the response difficult to read. Examples include “every creatures has,” “there multiple options,” and “Raising animals … in not only brutal,” where agreement or sentence structure is faulty. Articles and sentence construction also need attention in phrases such as “as important as human” and “It should be obligated not to harm.” Several sentences would be clearer if rewritten with a complete subject and verb. Practise accurate agreement, articles, and complex clauses before adding further complexity.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.