Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Barron's Writing · 2026-08-12

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

People should never eat meat because raising animals for human consumption is cruel.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?

Give reasons for your answer, and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

According to the current scenario, it is irrefutable to say that animals play an inevitable role in our environment. Although myriad reckon that animals can only use for food purpose. By and large, I contradict rendered perspective. My inclination backed my stance would be discussed in consequent paragraph.

In this paragraph, I would like to throw light on constructive facet of the notion of injustice with poor creatures. The predominant one is They also have a right to live. By owing to that, I would like to say that, Humans are killing innocents for their own happiness and selfishness. Another striking thought is it will give us bad energy. By this I mean to say that, food is giving us energy. But if we are having food by hurting someone, it will never give us positive vibes. Moreover, If we can't see over child in pain. Then we can not expect from a chicken to give her egg for our own benefit.

On the other hand, there are few advantages of having eggs and various meats. The mainspring is, the vitamins we can have from these kind of items; we can not have from veggies. For Instance, In comparison to lentil soup, Eggs will give us quick protein. Another effect is, if everyone will starts eating vegetables then there is a chance of the shortage in future. To illustrate, In my village we could not get enough spinach because of bad rainy session.

To consummate with reference of everything discussed in the above mentioned paragraphs, I pen down by saying that If we can, we should avoid harming animals for our own good.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 5.5

The response addresses the prompt by taking a position, but the development of ideas is inconsistent. While you present arguments for both sides, the reasoning is often superficial or relies on personal anecdotes rather than logical expansion. For example, the argument about 'bad energy' is subjective and lacks a clear connection to the ethical debate. The conclusion is somewhat vague, as it does not clearly reiterate your stance on the 'extent' of your agreement. To improve, ensure each paragraph focuses on a single, well-supported point with clear examples that directly relate to the ethical implications of meat consumption.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 5.5

The essay is organized into paragraphs, but the flow between and within them is often disjointed. Many sentences are linked by awkward or non-standard transitions, such as 'By owing to that' or 'The mainspring is'. The use of cohesive devices is often mechanical or misused, which hinders the logical progression of your argument. For instance, the transition 'To consummate with reference of everything' is not standard academic English. Improving your use of linking words and ensuring that each sentence logically follows the previous one will significantly enhance the clarity of your writing.

Lexical Resource — Band 5.0

Your vocabulary is limited and often used incorrectly, which impacts the precision of your argument. Phrases like 'current scenario', 'myriad reckon', and 'throw light on constructive facet' are used in ways that do not fit the context or are grammatically awkward. There is also a reliance on informal or imprecise language, such as 'bad energy' and 'poor creatures'. To reach a higher band, focus on using collocations accurately and expanding your range of academic vocabulary to express complex ideas more precisely rather than relying on memorized phrases.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.0

The essay contains frequent grammatical errors that occasionally impede communication. There are issues with subject-verb agreement (e.g., 'everyone will starts'), article usage, and sentence structure (e.g., 'My inclination backed my stance would be discussed'). Many sentences are fragmented or lack proper punctuation, making them difficult to follow. While you attempt some complex structures, they are often faulty. You should focus on mastering basic sentence construction and ensuring that your verb tenses and word order are consistent before attempting more complex grammatical forms.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.