Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Barron's Writing · 2026-08-16

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

People should never eat meat because raising animals for human consumption is cruel.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?

Give reasons for your answer, and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

Animals are quiet important for nature and they play vital role in humans life as well. so the consumption of animal should be prohibited which i strongly agree. Animals are the crucial part of food chain and economic growth. so here in this i am going to give some positive reasons of why humans should not eat meat.

first of all, there are so many animals are at verge of extinct. and day by day the population if animals are reducing by many factors such as flood, global warming and a lot more. along with this, there are a lot of religious factors are included with animals in certain countries where the beliefs are related to god. not only this i believe that there are many different options are available in the market to fulfill the nutritional value of human as i heard that some people eat meat as a source of protein which is not right.

secondly, i feel that to raising animal for human meals is not right and it is a total violation of animal rights according to the animal welfare association. Because to save wild life and animals there are a lot of programmes are running. but on other side some inferior mind people just think about themselves. which is very cruel. Moreover, no one has right to decide about someone life even if they are animals. everyone has right to livre fear free. animals provide us so many thing like comfort, peace even a good companionship.

to conclude, government should take legal action against those people who does the illegal supply of animals. Because animals also have the right to live and they are the most pivotal part of nature.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.0

The response addresses the prompt and maintains a clear position throughout. However, the development of ideas is somewhat limited. While you mention animal rights and environmental concerns, the arguments are not fully extended with specific evidence or logical depth. For instance, the mention of 'religious factors' is vague and lacks a clear connection to the argument against eating meat. To reach a higher band, ensure that each paragraph focuses on a single, well-supported idea that directly reinforces your stance. The conclusion is a bit repetitive and introduces a new point about 'illegal supply' which was not discussed in the body paragraphs.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 5.5

The essay is organized into paragraphs, which helps the reader follow your argument. However, the use of cohesive devices is often mechanical or inaccurate. For example, starting sentences with 'so' or 'and' is informal and disrupts the flow. There are also issues with referencing; phrases like 'not only this' and 'on other side' are used incorrectly. To improve, focus on using a wider variety of linking words (e.g., 'furthermore', 'consequently', 'in contrast') and ensure that each sentence logically follows the previous one to create a smoother progression of ideas.

Lexical Resource — Band 5.5

The vocabulary is generally adequate for the task but lacks precision and sophistication. There are several instances of awkward phrasing and word choice errors, such as 'quiet important' (should be 'quite'), 'at verge of extinct' (should be 'on the verge of extinction'), and 'inferior mind people'. These errors occasionally make the meaning less clear. To improve, try to incorporate more topic-specific vocabulary related to ethics, nutrition, and environmental science, and pay closer attention to collocations—the way words naturally pair together in English.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.0

The essay contains a mix of simple and complex sentence structures, but there are frequent grammatical errors throughout. Common issues include subject-verb agreement ('the population if animals are reducing'), article usage ('the consumption of animal'), and sentence fragments ('so the consumption of animal should be prohibited which i strongly agree'). Punctuation is also inconsistent, with many sentences starting with lowercase letters. While these errors do not completely impede communication, they are frequent enough to lower the score. Focus on proofreading for basic errors and practicing complex sentence structures to improve accuracy.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.